Edna E. Hingco
Impact in
- Sensory Systems top 1%
- Olfactory and Sensory Function Studies
-
- Neurobiology and Insect Physiology Research
Papers in
-
- Olfactory and Sensory Function Studies 7
-
- Neurobiology and Insect Physiology Research 4
- Co-authors
- Brett A. Johnson (6 shared papers)Michael Leon (5 shared papers)Cynthia C. Woo (4 shared papers)Zhe Xu (3 shared papers)Christiane Linster (1 shared paper)Yoojin Choi (1 shared paper)Sallis O. Yip (1 shared paper)María del Consuelo Escoto Ponce de León (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- The Journal of Comparative Neurology (4 papers)Chemical Senses (1 paper)Neuroreport (1 paper)PLoS ONE (1 paper)Journal of Neuroscience (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
Edna E. Hingco
9 papers receiving 503 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 55
- Sensory Systems 417
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 345
- Nutrition and Dietetics 253
- Developmental Neuroscience 33
- Neurology 50
Countries citing papers authored by Edna E. Hingco
This map shows the geographic impact of Edna E. Hingco's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Edna E. Hingco with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Edna E. Hingco more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Edna E. Hingco
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Edna E. Hingco. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Edna E. Hingco. The network helps show where Edna E. Hingco may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 19 scholars most cited alongside Edna E. Hingco, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2001 | 154 | |
| 2 | 1999 | 135 | |
| 3 | 2002 | 92 | |
| 4 | 2020 | 40 | |
| 5 | 2016 | 27 | |
| 6 | 2006 | 24 | |
| 7 | 2006 | 22 | |
| 8 | 1999 | 15 | |
| 9 | 2009 | 1 |
About Edna E. Hingco
Edna E. Hingco is a scholar working on Sensory Systems, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Neurology, Nutrition and Dietetics and Cognitive Neuroscience, having authored 9 papers that have together received 510 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Olfactory and Sensory Function Studies (7 papers), Neurobiology and Insect Physiology Research (4 papers), Biochemical Analysis and Sensing Techniques (3 papers), Memory and Neural Mechanisms (2 papers), Neuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms (2 papers), Neurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanisms (2 papers), Advanced Chemical Sensor Technologies (1 paper) and Neurological Disease Mechanisms and Treatments (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Sensory Systems (417 citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (345 citations), Nutrition and Dietetics (253 citations), Developmental Neuroscience (33 citations) and Neurology (50 citations). Edna E. Hingco has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Brett A. Johnson, Michael Leon, Cynthia C. Woo, Zhe Xu, Christiane Linster, Yoojin Choi, Sallis O. Yip, María del Consuelo Escoto Ponce de León, Chin Cheng Woo and Allison R. Najafi. Their work appears in journals such as The Journal of Comparative Neurology, Chemical Senses, Neuroreport, PLoS ONE and Journal of Neuroscience.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.