Edith M. Williams

60 papers receiving 612 citations

Peers

Edith M. Williams
Comparison fields: 5 of 103
  • Rheumatology 214
  • Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis 62
  • Speech and Hearing 26
  • Immunology 85
  • Occupational Therapy 16
Replace Margaret K. Formica with:
Margaret K. Formica United States
Noreen Maconochie United Kingdom
Rana Bayakly United States
Bethan Davies United Kingdom
Michael E. McDowall United Kingdom
Duc Thanh Nguyen Vietnam
Michelle Jackson Australia
Newton Kara-Júnior Brazil
Timothy J. Flood United States
Craig H. Syrop United States
Edith M. Williams relative to Margaret K. Formica United States Margaret K. Formica's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Margaret K. Formica · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Edith M. Williams

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Edith M. Williams's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Edith M. Williams with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Edith M. Williams more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Edith M. Williams

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Edith M. Williams. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Edith M. Williams. The network helps show where Edith M. Williams may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Edith M. Williams, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Edith M. Williams Line = papers co-authored together Edith M. Williams links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 65 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 199567
2 201251
3 201238
4 201435
5 199931
6 202330
7 201727
8 201423
9 201522
10 201721
11 201920
12 201919
13 201418
14 201515
15 201015
16 202115
17 201614
18 200513
19 200811
20 201311

About Edith M. Williams

Edith M. Williams is a scholar working on Rheumatology, General Health Professions, Sociology and Political Science, Epidemiology and Health, having authored 65 papers that have together received 639 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Research (22 papers), Environmental Justice and Health Disparities (7 papers), HIV/AIDS Research and Interventions (4 papers), Food Security and Health in Diverse Populations (3 papers), Liver Disease Diagnosis and Treatment (3 papers), Autoimmune and Inflammatory Disorders Research (3 papers), Mental Health Treatment and Access (3 papers) and Occupational Health and Performance (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Rheumatology (214 citations), Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis (62 citations), Speech and Hearing (26 citations), Immunology (85 citations) and Occupational Therapy (16 citations). Edith M. Williams has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Canada and Malaysia. Frequent co-authors include Jim C. Oates, Leonard E. Egede, Diane L. Kamen, Sacoby Wilson, Norma Radin, Saundra H. Glover, erik svendsen, Hongmei Zhang, Viswanathan Ramakrishnan and Winston E. Abara. Their work appears in journals such as International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, ACR Open Rheumatology, Journal of the National Medical Association and Journal of Cellular Physiology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact