Edith Kramer

564 citations
16 papers · 341 · h-index 8

Impact in

Papers in

Edith Kramer

15 papers receiving 211 citations

Peers

Edith Kramer
Comparison fields: 5 of 49
  • Conservation 264
  • Visual Arts and Performing Arts 89
  • Clinical Psychology 176
  • Social Psychology 76
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 41
Replace Arthur Robbins with:
Arthur Robbins United States
Linda Gantt United States
Lynn Kapitan United States
Diane Waller United Kingdom
Donna J. Betts United States
Gioia Chilton United States
Stephen K. Levine Canada
Val Huet United Kingdom
Savneet Talwar United States
Harald Gruber Germany
Edith Kramer relative to Arthur Robbins United States Arthur Robbins's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Arthur Robbins · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Edith Kramer

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Edith Kramer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Edith Kramer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Edith Kramer more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Edith Kramer

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Edith Kramer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Edith Kramer. The network helps show where Edith Kramer may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 11 scholars most cited alongside Edith Kramer, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Edith Kramer Line = papers co-authored together Edith Kramer links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

16 of 16 papers shown
#Work
1
Art as Therapy With Children
1971149
2 197538
3 195937
4
Art as Therapy: Collected Papers
200132
5 195816
6 197514
7
Childhood and Art Therapy: Notes on Theory and Application
197911
8 19948
9
Art therapy in the United States
19777
10 19807
11
Creativity and the dissociative patient : puppets, narrative, and art in the treatment of survvors of childhood trauma
19997
12 19745
13
Kunst als Therapie mit Kindern
19754
14
Art therapy and play.
19774
15
Quality in art therapy: a panel honoring Elinor Ulman.
19931
16 19721

About Edith Kramer

Edith Kramer is a scholar working on Conservation, Clinical Psychology, Information Systems, Social Psychology and Literature and Literary Theory, having authored 16 papers that have together received 341 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Art Therapy and Mental Health (14 papers), Child Therapy and Development (10 papers), Educational Methods and Teacher Development (5 papers), Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications (4 papers), American and British Literature Analysis (1 paper), Psychology, Coaching, and Therapy (1 paper), American Literature and Culture (1 paper) and Poetry Analysis and Criticism (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Conservation (264 citations), Visual Arts and Performing Arts (89 citations), Clinical Psychology (176 citations), Social Psychology (76 citations) and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (41 citations). Edith Kramer has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Arthur D. Efland, George Boas, Judith A. Rubin, Laurie Wilson, Raymond S. Stites, Frances E. Anderson, Robert Murray Davis, Peter Howie, Lesley Wilson and Kathleen Williams. Their work appears in journals such as Art Education, Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism, Studies in Art Education, Leonardo and Art Therapy.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact