Edith Chevret

1.9k citations
50 papers · 1.5k · h-index 18

Impact in

Papers in

Edith Chevret

47 papers receiving 1.4k citations

Peers

Edith Chevret
Comparison fields: 5 of 65
  • Dermatology 279
  • Reproductive Medicine 297
  • Molecular Biology 465
  • Genetics 192
  • Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health 67
Replace Dace Pjanova with:
Dace Pjanova Latvia
Jingly Fung Weier United States
Linda E. Fong United States
Mark David Ewalt United States
Nicolas Reynoird France
Anagh Anant Sahasrabuddhe United States
Claudia Piovan Italy
Jan de Groot Netherlands
A. Lehmann United Kingdom
Michelle Ottey United States
Edith Chevret relative to Dace Pjanova Latvia Dace Pjanova's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5×10×13.4×
Dace Pjanova · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Edith Chevret

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Edith Chevret's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Edith Chevret with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Edith Chevret more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Edith Chevret

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Edith Chevret. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Edith Chevret. The network helps show where Edith Chevret may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Edith Chevret, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Edith Chevret Line = papers co-authored together Edith Chevret links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 50 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2000358
2 2016113
3 201090
4 199481
5 201069
6 199668
7 199566
8 199758
9 201341
10 201640
11 200036
12 200736
13 199329
14 201625
15 201423
16 201723
17 200820
18 200519
19 202218
20 199517

About Edith Chevret

Edith Chevret is a scholar working on Dermatology, Reproductive Medicine, Genetics, Physiology and Molecular Biology, having authored 50 papers that have together received 1.5k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Cutaneous lymphoproliferative disorders research (17 papers), Sperm and Testicular Function (11 papers), Telomeres, Telomerase, and Senescence (9 papers), Genetic and Clinical Aspects of Sex Determination and Chromosomal Abnormalities (7 papers), Genomic variations and chromosomal abnormalities (6 papers), Epigenetics and DNA Methylation (3 papers), Genomics and Chromatin Dynamics (3 papers) and Lymphoma Diagnosis and Treatment (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Dermatology (279 citations), Reproductive Medicine (297 citations), Molecular Biology (465 citations), Genetics (192 citations) and Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health (67 citations). Edith Chevret has collaborated with scholars based in France, Lebanon and Portugal. Frequent co-authors include Sophie Rousseaux, Jean‐Philippe Merlio, Jean Cozzi, Roberte Pelletier, Emanuela Valeria Volpi, Denise Sheer, Marie Beylot-Barry, B Sèle, Béatrice Vergier and Michelle E. Goldsworthy. Their work appears in journals such as Human Genetics, Journal of Investigative Dermatology, Genes, PLoS ONE and Molecular Oncology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact