Edit Remák

427 citations
31 papers · 336 · h-index 10

Impact in

Papers in

Edit Remák

29 papers receiving 322 citations

Peers

Edit Remák
Comparison fields: 5 of 64
  • Economics and Econometrics 143
  • Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 132
  • Oncology 94
  • Gastroenterology 17
  • Cancer Research 43
Replace Lisel Koepl with:
Lisel Koepl United States
S.M. Babineaux United States
Timo Purmonen Finland
Narayan Rajan United States
Anna Rachelle Mislang Australia
Gracy Crane United Kingdom
Matthew Hale United Kingdom
Vishnukamal Golla United States
Raquel Molina Spain
Mingjun Rui China
Edit Remák relative to Lisel Koepl United States Lisel Koepl's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×8.5×
Lisel Koepl · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Edit Remák

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Edit Remák's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Edit Remák with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Edit Remák more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Edit Remák

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Edit Remák. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Edit Remák. The network helps show where Edit Remák may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Edit Remák, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Edit Remák Line = papers co-authored together Edit Remák links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 31 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 200877
2 200455
3 201137
4 200525
5 201220
6 200517
7 201816
8 201012
9 201510
10 20209
11 20198
12 20027
13 20076
14 20046
15 20215
16
Ceftaroline Fosamil for the Empiric Treatment of Hospitalized Adults with cSSTI: An Economic Analysis from the Perspective of the Spanish National Health System
20223
17 20183
18 20033
19 20192
20 20192

About Edit Remák

Edit Remák is a scholar working on Economics and Econometrics, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Cancer Research, Surgery and Oncology, having authored 31 papers that have together received 336 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Renal cell carcinoma treatment (10 papers), Economic and Financial Impacts of Cancer (9 papers), Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (6 papers), Hepatocellular Carcinoma Treatment and Prognosis (4 papers), Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics (4 papers), Pancreatic and Hepatic Oncology Research (3 papers), Pharmaceutical Economics and Policy (3 papers) and Breast Cancer Treatment Studies (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Economics and Econometrics (143 citations), Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine (132 citations), Oncology (94 citations), Gastroenterology (17 citations) and Cancer Research (43 citations). Edit Remák has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and France. Frequent co-authors include L. Brazil, Claudie Charbonneau, Sylvie Négrier, Robert J. Motzer, Sindy T. Kim, Martin Price, Caroline Selai, Michael Trimble, John Hutton and Ágnes Benedict. Their work appears in journals such as Value in Health, Journal of Clinical Oncology, Current Medical Research and Opinion, ClinicoEconomics and Outcomes Research and Journal of Medical Economics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact