Edison Thomaz

51 papers receiving 1.4k citations

Peers

Edison Thomaz
Comparison fields: 5 of 112
  • Human-Computer Interaction 381
  • Applied Psychology 190
  • Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition 472
  • General Health Professions 286
  • Signal Processing 117
Replace Nabil Alshurafa with:
Nabil Alshurafa United States
Juha Pärkkä Finland
Mashfiqui Rabbi United States
Miíkka Ermes Finland
Haik Kalantarian United States
Tauhidur Rahman United States
Jonathan Lester United States
Robert Dickerson United States
Evdokimos Konstantinidis Greece
Oscar Mayora Italy
Edison Thomaz relative to Nabil Alshurafa United States Nabil Alshurafa's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Nabil Alshurafa · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Edison Thomaz

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Edison Thomaz's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Edison Thomaz with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Edison Thomaz more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Edison Thomaz

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Edison Thomaz. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Edison Thomaz. The network helps show where Edison Thomaz may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Edison Thomaz, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Edison Thomaz Line = papers co-authored together Edison Thomaz links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 56 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2015219
2 2015186
3 2017126
4 202078
5 201968
6 201861
7 201349
8 201543
9 201841
10 201539
11 201338
12 201538
13 201937
14 201925
15 202222
16 202022
17 202120
18 202220
19 202120
20 201719

About Edison Thomaz

Edison Thomaz is a scholar working on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Human-Computer Interaction, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, General Health Professions and Electrical and Electronic Engineering, having authored 56 papers that have together received 1.4k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Context-Aware Activity Recognition Systems (19 papers), Innovative Human-Technology Interaction (13 papers), Mobile Health and mHealth Applications (10 papers), Nutritional Studies and Diet (10 papers), Speech and Audio Processing (6 papers), Music and Audio Processing (5 papers), Eating Disorders and Behaviors (4 papers) and Obstructive Sleep Apnea Research (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Human-Computer Interaction (381 citations), Applied Psychology (190 citations), Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (472 citations), General Health Professions (286 citations) and Signal Processing (117 citations). Edison Thomaz has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Gregory D. Abowd, Irfan Essa, Daniel A. Epstein, Felicia Cordeiro, James Fogarty, Keum San Chun, Elizabeth Bales, Aman Parnami, Abdelkareem Bedri and Thad Starner. Their work appears in journals such as Proceedings of the ACM on Interactive Mobile Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies, Urology, Alzheimer s & Dementia, Contemporary Clinical Trials and JMIR Serious Games.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact