Edeltraud Schmitt
About
In The Last Decade
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Edeltraud Schmitt
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Edeltraud Schmitt. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Edeltraud Schmitt based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Edeltraud Schmitt. Edeltraud Schmitt is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Edeltraud Schmitt
19 papers receiving 298 citations
Fields of papers citing papers by Edeltraud Schmitt
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Edeltraud Schmitt. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Edeltraud Schmitt. The network helps show where Edeltraud Schmitt may publish in the future.
Countries citing papers authored by Edeltraud Schmitt
This map shows the geographic impact of Edeltraud Schmitt's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Edeltraud Schmitt with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Edeltraud Schmitt more than expected).
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.