Synthesis

387.6k citations
20.4k papers · · active since 1970

Impact in

    • Asymmetric Synthesis and Catalysis
    • Organic Chemistry Synthesis Methods
    • Catalytic Cross-Coupling Reactions
    • Chemical Synthesis and Reactions
    • Advanced Synthetic Organic Chemistry
    • Radical Photochemical Reactions
    • Oxidative Organic Chemistry Reactions
    • Synthesis of heterocyclic compounds

Papers in

    • Organic Chemistry Synthesis Methods 3.5k
    • Asymmetric Synthesis and Catalysis 2.7k
    • Chemical Synthesis and Reactions 2.6k
    • Advanced Synthetic Organic Chemistry 2.5k
    • Synthesis of heterocyclic compounds 1.9k
    • Catalytic Cross-Coupling Reactions 1.9k
    • Oxidative Organic Chemistry Reactions 1.2k
    • Sulfur-Based Synthesis Techniques 1.2k

Synthesis

20k papers receiving 360.7k citations

Peers

Synthesis
Comparison fields: 5 of 228
  • Organic Chemistry 315.9k
  • Pharmaceutical Science 14.6k
  • Inorganic Chemistry 21.6k
  • Process Chemistry and Technology 2.3k
  • Toxicology 6.6k
Replace European Journal of Organic Chemistry with:
European Journal of Organic Chemistry Germany
Organic & Biomolecular Chemistry China
Synlett Japan
Journal of the Chemical Society Perkin Transactions 1 United Kingdom
Advanced Synthesis & Catalysis China
Chemistry Letters Japan
Chemische Berichte Germany
Bioorganic & Medicinal Chemistry Letters United States
European Journal of Medicinal Chemistry China
Bulletin of the Chemical Society of Japan Japan
Synthesis relative to European Journal of Organic Chemistry Germany European Journal of Organic Chemistry's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
European Journal of Organic Chemistry · 1×
Citations per year

Countries where authors publish in Synthesis

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Synthesis. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Synthesis with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Synthesis more than expected).

Fields of papers published in Synthesis

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Synthesis. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Synthesis.

About Synthesis

The 20.4k papers published in Synthesis in the last decades have received a total of 387.6k indexed citations . Papers published in Synthesis usually cover Organic Chemistry (18.5k papers), Pharmaceutical Science (860 papers), Toxicology (333 papers), Process Chemistry and Technology (76 papers) and Inorganic Chemistry (515 papers) specifically the topics of Organic Chemistry Synthesis Methods (3.5k papers), Asymmetric Synthesis and Catalysis (2.7k papers), Chemical Synthesis and Reactions (2.6k papers), Advanced Synthetic Organic Chemistry (2.5k papers), Synthesis of heterocyclic compounds (1.9k papers), Catalytic Cross-Coupling Reactions (1.9k papers), Oxidative Organic Chemistry Reactions (1.2k papers) and Sulfur-Based Synthesis Techniques (1.2k papers). The most active scholars publishing in Synthesis are Oyo Mitsunobu, Heinz Dürr, Dennis P. Curran, Barry M. Trost, Alexander J. Fatiadi, Masahiro Terada, George Andrew Olah, Kenneth Khosrow Laali, Dieter Enders and JEAN F. NORMANT.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact