Eben Lazarus

739 citations
14 papers · 412 · h-index 9

Impact in

Papers in

Eben Lazarus

14 papers receiving 398 citations

Peers

Eben Lazarus
Comparison fields: 5 of 76
  • Finance 129
  • General Economics, Econometrics and Finance 87
  • Infectious Diseases 112
  • General Decision Sciences 10
  • Epidemiology 162
Replace Evan Moore with:
Evan Moore United States
Laurence Bousquet France
Munik Shrestha United States
Nabil Khoury Canada
Xiao Jiang China
Youssef El‐Khatib United Arab Emirates
Pratheepa Jeganathan United States
R. Prabhakar Rao India
Marta Vidal Spain
Emese Lazar United Kingdom
Eben Lazarus relative to Evan Moore United States Evan Moore's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.8×
Evan Moore · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Eben Lazarus

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Eben Lazarus's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Eben Lazarus with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Eben Lazarus more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Eben Lazarus

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Eben Lazarus. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Eben Lazarus. The network helps show where Eben Lazarus may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 14 scholars most cited alongside Eben Lazarus, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Eben Lazarus Line = papers co-authored together Eben Lazarus links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

14 of 14 papers shown
#Work
1 1991176
2 2018121
3 202329
4 201918
5 202116
6 202211
7 201810
8 20249
9 20188
10 20224
11 20224
12 20193
13 20182
14 20231

About Eben Lazarus

Eben Lazarus is a scholar working on Finance, General Economics, Econometrics and Finance, Strategy and Management, Economics and Econometrics and Signal Processing, having authored 14 papers that have together received 412 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Financial Markets and Investment Strategies (7 papers), Monetary Policy and Economic Impact (5 papers), Stochastic processes and financial applications (3 papers), Financial Reporting and Valuation Research (3 papers), Housing Market and Economics (2 papers), Corporate Finance and Governance (2 papers), Blind Source Separation Techniques (2 papers) and Statistical Methods and Inference (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Finance (129 citations), General Economics, Econometrics and Finance (87 citations), Infectious Diseases (112 citations), General Decision Sciences (10 citations) and Epidemiology (162 citations). Eben Lazarus has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Denmark. Frequent co-authors include James H. Stock, Daniel Lewis, Mark W. Watson, Niels Joachim Gormsen, Priya Mohanty, David W. Feigal, Gunnard Modin, Merle A. Sande, Mark Z. Jacobson and W K Hadley. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Business and Economic Statistics, The Journal of Infectious Diseases, The Journal of Finance, The Quarterly Journal of Economics and Econometrica.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact