E.B. Mawer

131 papers receiving 4.9k citations

Peers

E.B. Mawer
Comparison fields: 5 of 128
  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine 2.6k
  • Nephrology 901
  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine 838
  • Nutrition and Dietetics 762
  • Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism 731
Replace P. Rødbro with:
P. Rødbro Denmark
C. E. Dent United Kingdom
Klaus Ølgaard Denmark
Barbara Obermayer‐Pietsch Austria
Harald Dobnig Austria
Jacob Lemann United States
J. L. H. O’Riordan United States
J Štěpán Czechia
Thomas O. Carpenter United States
Ranuccio Nuti Italy
E.B. Mawer relative to P. Rødbro Denmark P. Rødbro's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×6.3×
P. Rødbro · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by E.B. Mawer

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of E.B. Mawer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by E.B. Mawer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites E.B. Mawer more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by E.B. Mawer

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by E.B. Mawer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by E.B. Mawer. The network helps show where E.B. Mawer may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside E.B. Mawer, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with E.B. Mawer Line = papers co-authored together E.B. Mawer links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 131 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2000375
2 1972271
3 2001196
4 1993176
5 1999173
6 1973167
7 1992148
8 1999134
9 1971122
10 2001110
11 1971109
12 1987103
13 2000102
14 199493
15 199493
16 199887
17 197784
18 199782
19 198580
20 199978

About E.B. Mawer

E.B. Mawer is a scholar working on Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Genetics, Molecular Biology, Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism and Oncology, having authored 131 papers that have together received 5.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Vitamin D Research Studies (81 papers), Bone health and treatments (17 papers), Parathyroid Disorders and Treatments (17 papers), Bone health and osteoporosis research (13 papers), Diet and metabolism studies (8 papers), Metabolism, Diabetes, and Cancer (8 papers), Estrogen and related hormone effects (8 papers) and Biotin and Related Studies (7 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Pathology and Forensic Medicine (2.6k citations), Nephrology (901 citations), Orthopedics and Sports Medicine (838 citations), Nutrition and Dietetics (762 citations) and Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism (731 citations). E.B. Mawer has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and France. Frequent co-authors include G. A. Lumb, Sarah Stanbury, Michael Davies, Peter Selby, Jacqueline Berry, Nigel Bundred, M.E. Hayes, Anthony J. Freemont, Ann E. Canfield and A.P. Mee. Their work appears in journals such as Bone, The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism, Clinical Science, Clinical Endocrinology and The Lancet.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact