E. Thomas Doherty

37 papers receiving 626 citations

Peers

E. Thomas Doherty
Comparison fields: 5 of 90
  • Media Technology 122
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 171
  • Physiology 288
  • Speech and Hearing 71
  • Signal Processing 114
Replace Tomasz Łętowski with:
Tomasz Łętowski United States
Zhao Ren Germany
V. Rodellar Spain
Damian Murphy United Kingdom
Christophe d’Alessandro France
Osman Eroğul Türkiye
Stuart Cunningham United Kingdom
Nathalie Henrich Bernardoni France
Yuki Hayashi Japan
Steven Sandoval United States
E. Thomas Doherty relative to Tomasz Łętowski United States Tomasz Łętowski's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×15×20.3×
Tomasz Łętowski · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by E. Thomas Doherty

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of E. Thomas Doherty's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by E. Thomas Doherty with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites E. Thomas Doherty more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by E. Thomas Doherty

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by E. Thomas Doherty. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by E. Thomas Doherty. The network helps show where E. Thomas Doherty may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside E. Thomas Doherty, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with E. Thomas Doherty Line = papers co-authored together E. Thomas Doherty links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 40 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 197379
2 196572
3 198058
4 198255
5 196843
6 199441
7 198841
8
Speech measures indicating workload demand.
199438
9 199825
10 198825
11 198725
12 199018
13 197117
14 197916
15 196916
16 196915
17 199913
18 200013
19 196813
20 197812

About E. Thomas Doherty

E. Thomas Doherty is a scholar working on Artificial Intelligence, Signal Processing, Physiology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, having authored 40 papers that have together received 710 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Voice and Speech Disorders (13 papers), Speech Recognition and Synthesis (13 papers), Phonetics and Phonology Research (9 papers), Speech and Audio Processing (8 papers), Advanced Optical Imaging Technologies (6 papers), Music and Audio Processing (6 papers), Music Technology and Sound Studies (5 papers) and Photorefractive and Nonlinear Optics (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Media Technology (122 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (171 citations), Physiology (288 citations), Speech and Hearing (71 citations) and Signal Processing (114 citations). E. Thomas Doherty has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Japan and Sweden. Frequent co-authors include Thomas Shipp, Harry Hollien, R.J. Collier, C Burckhardt, Thomas Murry, John F. Michel, K. S. Pennington, Charles G. Reed, Mark I. Singer and Daniel G. Deschler. Their work appears in journals such as The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, Journal of Voice, Journal of Phonetics, Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research and Otolaryngology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact