E. Smith

290 papers receiving 4.0k citations

Peers

E. Smith
Comparison fields: 5 of 170
  • Metals and Alloys 205
  • Mechanics of Materials 1.5k
  • Gender Studies 261
  • Mechanical Engineering 1.0k
  • Clinical Psychology 522
Replace Roman Cieślak with:
Roman Cieślak United States
Antonio Jose Ramirez Brazil
Gareth Martin Thomas United States
Benjamín A. Shaw United States
Robert A. Bell United States
W. Carl Cooley United States
Monika Henderson United Kingdom
Claire Harris Australia
Brian C Jolly Australia
Gary L. St. C. Oates United States
E. Smith relative to Roman Cieślak United States Roman Cieślak's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×4×6×7.5×
Roman Cieślak · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by E. Smith

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of E. Smith's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by E. Smith with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites E. Smith more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by E. Smith

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by E. Smith. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by E. Smith. The network helps show where E. Smith may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside E. Smith, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with E. Smith Line = papers co-authored together E. Smith links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 317 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2011201
2 2013174
3 2015168
4 1967153
5 1956128
6 2017124
7 2014121
8 1964115
9 2011107
10 196896
11 200689
12 200586
13 196882
14 196782
15 196773
16 201270
17 201767
18 201564
19 196660
20 196959

About E. Smith

E. Smith is a scholar working on Mechanics of Materials, Mechanical Engineering, Materials Chemistry, Metals and Alloys and Civil and Structural Engineering, having authored 317 papers that have together received 4.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Fatigue and fracture mechanics (181 papers), High-Velocity Impact and Material Behavior (41 papers), Material Properties and Failure Mechanisms (37 papers), Numerical methods in engineering (36 papers), Non-Destructive Testing Techniques (36 papers), Ultrasonics and Acoustic Wave Propagation (29 papers), Nuclear Materials and Properties (25 papers) and Microstructure and mechanical properties (25 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Metals and Alloys (205 citations), Mechanics of Materials (1.5k citations), Gender Studies (261 citations), Mechanical Engineering (1.0k citations) and Clinical Psychology (522 citations). E. Smith has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Australia. Frequent co-authors include J. T. Barnby, Bruce Alexander Bilby, Roz Ward, Tiffany Mary Jones, Johanna Koerting, Margaret J. J. Thompson, Edmund J. S. Sonuga-Barke, Stephen I.G. Barclay, Isla L. Kuhn and Natalie C. Momen. Their work appears in journals such as International Journal of Pressure Vessels and Piping, International Journal of Engineering Science, International Journal of Fracture, Engineering Fracture Mechanics and Journal of Materials Science.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact