Engineering Fracture Mechanics

12.8k papers and 311.1k indexed citations i.

About

The 12.8k papers published in Engineering Fracture Mechanics in the last decades have received a total of 311.1k indexed citations. Papers published in Engineering Fracture Mechanics usually cover Mechanics of Materials (11.0k papers), Mechanical Engineering (5.0k papers) and Civil and Structural Engineering (3.5k papers) specifically the topics of Fatigue and fracture mechanics (6.7k papers), Numerical methods in engineering (3.7k papers) and Mechanical Behavior of Composites (2.0k papers). The most active scholars publishing in Engineering Fracture Mechanics are Gordon R. Johnson, William H. Cook, W. Elber, I. S. Raju, James C. Newman, David Taylor, M.R. Ayatollahi, M.R.M. Aliha, Kim Wallin and Andrew D. Dimarogonas.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Engineering Fracture Mechanics

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Engineering Fracture Mechanics. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Engineering Fracture Mechanics.

Countries where authors publish in Engineering Fracture Mechanics

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Engineering Fracture Mechanics. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Engineering Fracture Mechanics with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Engineering Fracture Mechanics more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025