E. Scott Weber

40 papers receiving 663 citations

Peers

E. Scott Weber
Comparison fields: 5 of 83
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation 348
  • Parasitology 103
  • Virology 60
  • Small Animals 78
  • Immunology 186
Replace Brent R. Whitaker with:
Brent R. Whitaker United States
Sonia M. Hernandez‐Divers United States
Jean A. Paré United States
Graham J. Crawshaw Canada
Scott P. Terrell United States
Donald L. Neiffer United States
Michael R. Loomis United States
Kathryn C. Gamble United States
Wes Baumgartner United States
Hendrik H. Nollens United States
E. Scott Weber relative to Brent R. Whitaker United States Brent R. Whitaker's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Brent R. Whitaker · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by E. Scott Weber

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of E. Scott Weber's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by E. Scott Weber with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites E. Scott Weber more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by E. Scott Weber

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by E. Scott Weber. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by E. Scott Weber. The network helps show where E. Scott Weber may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside E. Scott Weber, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with E. Scott Weber Line = papers co-authored together E. Scott Weber links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 41 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 200769
2 200962
3 200951
4 200945
5 200942
6 200842
7 200938
8 201038
9 201437
10 200220
11 201119
12 201217
13 200415
14 201314
15 201413
16 200812
17 201312
18 201512
19 201212
20 201312

About E. Scott Weber

E. Scott Weber is a scholar working on Nature and Landscape Conservation, Immunology, Aquatic Science, Small Animals and Animal Science and Zoology, having authored 41 papers that have together received 684 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Aquaculture disease management and microbiota (18 papers), Turtle Biology and Conservation (13 papers), Fish Ecology and Management Studies (5 papers), Microbial infections and disease research (5 papers), Antibiotics Pharmacokinetics and Efficacy (3 papers), Veterinary Pharmacology and Anesthesia (3 papers), Myxozoan Parasites in Aquatic Species (3 papers) and Aquatic life and conservation (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Nature and Landscape Conservation (348 citations), Parasitology (103 citations), Virology (60 citations), Small Animals (78 citations) and Immunology (186 citations). E. Scott Weber has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Canada and France. Frequent co-authors include Charles J. Innis, Constance Merigo, Michael F. Tlusty, Salvatore Frasca, B. Palmeiro, Helen Roberts, Akinyi C. Nyaoke, Joanne Paul‐Murphy, Lynn Hinckley and Alan M. Klide. Their work appears in journals such as Veterinary Clinics of North America Exotic Animal Practice, Journal of Veterinary Diagnostic Investigation, Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association, Journal of Veterinary Pharmacology and Therapeutics and Veterinary Radiology & Ultrasound.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact