E. M. Wright

93 papers receiving 978 citations

Peers

E. M. Wright
Comparison fields: 5 of 153
  • Discrete Mathematics and Combinatorics 292
  • Algebra and Number Theory 146
  • Geometry and Topology 207
  • Mathematical Physics 182
  • Theoretical Computer Science 25
Replace Peter Hilton with:
Peter Hilton United States
Jerrold W. Grossman United States
J. R. Shoenfield United States
William Watkins United States
Charles H. Kraft Canada
J. C. P. Miller United Kingdom
Douglas Lind United States
George Boole
Elliott Mendelson United States
R. R. Laxton United Kingdom
E. M. Wright relative to Peter Hilton United States Peter Hilton's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.2×
Peter Hilton · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by E. M. Wright

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of E. M. Wright's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by E. M. Wright with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites E. M. Wright more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by E. M. Wright

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by E. M. Wright. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by E. M. Wright. The network helps show where E. M. Wright may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside E. M. Wright, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with E. M. Wright Line = papers co-authored together E. M. Wright links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 102 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 197793
2 199679
3 201062
4 197149
5 198047
6
An Elementary Middle English Grammar
197946
7 196544
8 198542
9 197040
10 201535
11 196628
12 196725
13
Old English grammar
198325
14 200223
15 195922
16 196822
17 197020
18 198117
19 198617
20 200416

About E. M. Wright

E. M. Wright is a scholar working on Computational Theory and Mathematics, Geometry and Topology, Algebra and Number Theory, Discrete Mathematics and Combinatorics and Theoretical Computer Science, having authored 102 papers that have together received 1.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Advanced Graph Theory Research (20 papers), Graph theory and applications (11 papers), Analytic Number Theory Research (11 papers), Graph Labeling and Dimension Problems (9 papers), History and Theory of Mathematics (7 papers), Advanced Mathematical Identities (6 papers), Advanced Combinatorial Mathematics (6 papers) and Mathematics and Applications (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Discrete Mathematics and Combinatorics (292 citations), Algebra and Number Theory (146 citations), Geometry and Topology (207 citations), Mathematical Physics (182 citations) and Theoretical Computer Science (25 citations). E. M. Wright has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Mozambique. Frequent co-authors include Michael Whitaker, Nile M. Khanfar, Catherine Harrington, Martin Wilding, Graham C. R. Ellis‐Davies, R. M. Patel, Geoffrey Yarranton, G.C. Stevens, C. A. Caulcott and Roland Clift. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of the London Mathematical Society, The Quarterly Journal of Mathematics, Proceedings of the London Mathematical Society, Proceedings of the American Mathematical Society and Bulletin of the London Mathematical Society.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact