E. Luke Bold
Impact in
- Neurology top 2%
- Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies
- Neurological disorders and treatments
- Developmental Neuroscience top 5%
- Neurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanisms
Papers in
-
- Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research 4
- Co-authors
- Edward J. Neafsey (4 shared papers)Gregory J. Quirk (3 shared papers)Carl F. Sievert (3 shared papers)Robert R. Terreberry (3 shared papers)Gretchen L. Haas (2 shared papers)Anthony J. Castro (2 shared papers)John R. Wanamaker (3 shared papers)Jens Zimmer (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- The Laryngoscope (3 papers)Journal of Nephrology (1 paper)American Journal of Otolaryngology (1 paper)The American Journal of Surgery (1 paper)Brain Research Reviews (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United StatesDenmarkBrazil
In The Last Decade
E. Luke Bold
12 papers receiving 1.4k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 79
- Neurology 360
- Developmental Neuroscience 171
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 781
- Cognitive Neuroscience 640
- Neurology 226
Countries citing papers authored by E. Luke Bold
This map shows the geographic impact of E. Luke Bold's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by E. Luke Bold with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites E. Luke Bold more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by E. Luke Bold
This network shows the impact of papers produced by E. Luke Bold. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by E. Luke Bold. The network helps show where E. Luke Bold may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside E. Luke Bold, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1986 | 657 | |
| 2 | 1986 | 593 | |
| 3 | 1985 | 55 | |
| 4 | 1994 | 34 | |
| 5 | Adenomatous lesions of the temporal bone immunohistochemical analysis and theories of histogenesis. | 1995 | 32 |
| 6 | 1984 | 26 | |
| 7 | 1996 | 17 | |
| 8 | 1994 | 16 | |
| 9 | 1990 | 12 | |
| 10 | 1994 | 7 | |
| 11 | The primary motor cortex of the owl monkey: a microstimulation mapping study of the leg and arm areas | 1983 | 5 |
| 12 | 2024 | 1 |
About E. Luke Bold
E. Luke Bold is a scholar working on Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Neurology, Cognitive Neuroscience, Developmental Neuroscience and Otorhinolaryngology, having authored 12 papers that have together received 1.5k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (4 papers), Head and Neck Surgical Oncology (2 papers), Neural dynamics and brain function (2 papers), Ear and Head Tumors (2 papers), Functional Brain Connectivity Studies (2 papers), Ear Surgery and Otitis Media (1 paper), Facial Trauma and Fracture Management (1 paper) and Tracheal and airway disorders (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Neurology (360 citations), Developmental Neuroscience (171 citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (781 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (640 citations) and Neurology (226 citations). E. Luke Bold has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Denmark and Brazil. Frequent co-authors include Edward J. Neafsey, Gregory J. Quirk, Carl F. Sievert, Robert R. Terreberry, Gretchen L. Haas, Anthony J. Castro, John R. Wanamaker, Jens Zimmer, Niels Aa. Sunde and Pierre Lavertu. Their work appears in journals such as The Laryngoscope, Journal of Nephrology, American Journal of Otolaryngology, The American Journal of Surgery and Brain Research Reviews.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.