E. L. Powers

70 papers receiving 1.4k citations

Peers

E. L. Powers
Comparison fields: 5 of 138
  • Food Science 360
  • Biophysics 95
  • Cancer Research 166
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 230
  • Biotechnology 89
Replace D. L. Dewey with:
D. L. Dewey United Kingdom
Franklin Hutchinson United States
Robert B. Webb United States
S. Okada Japan
Tsutomu Sugahara Japan
Thormod Henriksen Norway
John Jagger United States
U. Hagen Germany
Meyrick J. Peak United States
F. W. J. Teale United Kingdom
E. L. Powers relative to D. L. Dewey United Kingdom D. L. Dewey's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.0×
D. L. Dewey · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by E. L. Powers

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of E. L. Powers's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by E. L. Powers with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites E. L. Powers more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by E. L. Powers

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by E. L. Powers. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by E. L. Powers. The network helps show where E. L. Powers may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside E. L. Powers, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with E. L. Powers Line = papers co-authored together E. L. Powers links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 72 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1
Oxygen and oxy-radicals in chemistry and biology
1981190
2 196083
3 195978
4 196267
5 196362
6 200658
7 197658
8 195656
9 197055
10 198551
11 197250
12 197446
13 196045
14 195742
15 196041
16 196841
17 195640
18 198637
19 195537
20 196034

About E. L. Powers

E. L. Powers is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Food Science, Biotechnology, Organic Chemistry and Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, having authored 72 papers that have together received 1.8k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Radiation Effects and Dosimetry (21 papers), DNA Repair Mechanisms (7 papers), Protist diversity and phylogeny (7 papers), Effects of Radiation Exposure (7 papers), Plant Genetic and Mutation Studies (6 papers), Radioactive contamination and transfer (6 papers), Microbial Inactivation Methods (6 papers) and Radioactive element chemistry and processing (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Food Science (360 citations), Biophysics (95 citations), Cancer Research (166 citations), Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (230 citations) and Biotechnology (89 citations). E. L. Powers has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Belgium. Frequent co-authors include C. F. Ehret, Michael A. J. Rodgers, Robert B. Webb, Michael G. Simic, Robert C. Richmond, A. Tallentire, P.C. Kesavan, Kathryn D. Held, T. N. Tahmisian and R. L. Devine. Their work appears in journals such as Radiation Research, The Journal of Experimental Medicine, Science, Photochemistry and Photobiology and The Journal of Cell Biology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact