E. I. Harper
Impact in
-
- Neuropeptides and Animal Physiology
- Nerve injury and regeneration
- Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
- Developmental Neuroscience top 10%
Papers in
-
- Monoclonal and Polyclonal Antibodies Research 5
- Radiopharmaceutical Chemistry and Applications 2
-
- Neuropeptides and Animal Physiology 2
- Co-authors
- Jeremy A. Garson (9 shared papers)Hugh B. Coakham (4 shared papers)A. A. Harper (2 shared papers)Sally N. Lawson (2 shared papers)Brian H. Anderton (1 shared paper)Peter C. L. Beverley (1 shared paper)Betty Brownell (6 shared papers)Patricia Allan (4 shared papers)
- Journals
- Inflammation Research (2 papers)Neuropathology and Applied Neurobiology (1 paper)The Journal of Comparative Neurology (1 paper)Nature (1 paper)The Lancet (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomRussiaIndonesia
In The Last Decade
E. I. Harper
14 papers receiving 711 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 83
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 237
- Developmental Neuroscience 34
- Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 185
- Neurology 109
- Immunology and Allergy 43
Countries citing papers authored by E. I. Harper
This map shows the geographic impact of E. I. Harper's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by E. I. Harper with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites E. I. Harper more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by E. I. Harper
This network shows the impact of papers produced by E. I. Harper. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by E. I. Harper. The network helps show where E. I. Harper may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 21 scholars most cited alongside E. I. Harper, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1984 | 269 | |
| 2 | 1982 | 168 | |
| 3 | 1983 | 120 | |
| 4 | 1984 | 57 | |
| 5 | 1985 | 49 | |
| 6 | 1985 | 33 | |
| 7 | 1985 | 27 | |
| 8 | 1988 | 11 | |
| 9 | 1989 | 10 | |
| 10 | 1984 | 9 | |
| 11 | 1986 | 3 | |
| 12 | 1988 | 3 | |
| 13 | MONOCLONAL-ANTIBODIES IN DIAGNOSTIC NEUROPATHOLOGY | 1984 | 2 |
| 14 | 2010 | 2 |
About E. I. Harper
E. I. Harper is a scholar working on Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Surgery, Molecular Biology and Dermatology, having authored 14 papers that have together received 763 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Monoclonal and Polyclonal Antibodies Research (5 papers), Allergic Rhinitis and Sensitization (2 papers), Dermatology and Skin Diseases (2 papers), Olfactory and Sensory Function Studies (2 papers), Radiopharmaceutical Chemistry and Applications (2 papers), Neuropeptides and Animal Physiology (2 papers), Glycosylation and Glycoproteins Research (1 paper) and Bartonella species infections research (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (237 citations), Developmental Neuroscience (34 citations), Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (185 citations), Neurology (109 citations) and Immunology and Allergy (43 citations). E. I. Harper has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Russia and Indonesia. Frequent co-authors include Jeremy A. Garson, Hugh B. Coakham, A. A. Harper, Sally N. Lawson, Brian H. Anderton, Peter C. L. Beverley, Betty Brownell, Patricia Allan, J. T. Kemshead and H.B. Coakham. Their work appears in journals such as Inflammation Research, Neuropathology and Applied Neurobiology, The Journal of Comparative Neurology, Nature and The Lancet.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.