E. Hofer

1.4k citations
91 papers · 1.0k · h-index 19

Impact in

Papers in

E. Hofer

83 papers receiving 956 citations

Peers

E. Hofer
Comparison fields: 5 of 110
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 325
  • Numerical Analysis 61
  • Control and Systems Engineering 219
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 107
  • Computational Mechanics 90
Replace Joakim Sundnes with:
Joakim Sundnes Norway
Toshiaki Hisada Japan
Michel Sorine France
Anders Eriksson Sweden
Phani Chinchapatnam United Kingdom
Sigrid Leyendecker Germany
Anton J. Prassl Austria
S. Chakravarty United States
Alan V. Sahakian United States
Guillaume Crevecoeur Belgium
E. Hofer relative to Joakim Sundnes Norway Joakim Sundnes's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.0×
Joakim Sundnes · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by E. Hofer

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of E. Hofer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by E. Hofer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites E. Hofer more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by E. Hofer

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by E. Hofer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by E. Hofer. The network helps show where E. Hofer may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside E. Hofer, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with E. Hofer Line = papers co-authored together E. Hofer links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 91 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 200996
2 198884
3 200071
4 197654
5 200738
6 201436
7 199233
8 201331
9 196831
10 200129
11 200127
12 200725
13 199924
14 199923
15 199421
16 200021
17 198720
18 200018
19 200818
20 200516

About E. Hofer

E. Hofer is a scholar working on Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Control and Systems Engineering, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Biomedical Engineering and Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, having authored 91 papers that have together received 1.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Cardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmias (24 papers), Neuroscience and Neural Engineering (16 papers), ECG Monitoring and Analysis (11 papers), Robotic Path Planning Algorithms (9 papers), Numerical Methods and Algorithms (7 papers), Control and Dynamics of Mobile Robots (7 papers), Dynamics and Control of Mechanical Systems (6 papers) and Advanced Control Systems Optimization (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (325 citations), Numerical Analysis (61 citations), Control and Systems Engineering (219 citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (107 citations) and Computational Mechanics (90 citations). E. Hofer has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, Austria and Spain. Frequent co-authors include Bernd Tibken, Gernot Plank, Christoph Ament, Christian Rembe, Anton J. Prassl, Helmut Ahammer, Natalia A. Trayanova, Harald Aschemann, Markus Meiler and Stefan aus der Wiesche. Their work appears in journals such as IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, Heat and Mass Transfer, Journal of Power Sources, Annals of Biomedical Engineering and Basic Research in Cardiology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact