E. Hampton Sessions

816 citations
21 papers · 702 · h-index 16

Impact in

Papers in

E. Hampton Sessions

21 papers receiving 684 citations

Peers

E. Hampton Sessions
Comparison fields: 5 of 58
  • Geriatrics and Gerontology 119
  • Organic Chemistry 281
  • Molecular Biology 227
  • Computational Theory and Mathematics 43
  • Aging 4
Replace John C. Ulrich with:
John C. Ulrich United States
Patricia Amouzegh United States
Michael J. Kates United States
Estelle M.-N. Hamelin United Kingdom
Jun Young Hong United States
Ann Qin United States
Marat Meleshin Germany
Pernille‐Julia Vig Hjarnaa Denmark
Massimo Ghizzoni Netherlands
E. Hampton Sessions relative to John C. Ulrich United States John C. Ulrich's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3.3×
John C. Ulrich · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by E. Hampton Sessions

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of E. Hampton Sessions's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by E. Hampton Sessions with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites E. Hampton Sessions more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by E. Hampton Sessions

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by E. Hampton Sessions. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by E. Hampton Sessions. The network helps show where E. Hampton Sessions may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside E. Hampton Sessions, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with E. Hampton Sessions Line = papers co-authored together E. Hampton Sessions links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 21 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2019135
2 200884
3 199967
4 201857
5 201147
6 201142
7 201129
8 201729
9 200227
10 200622
11 201022
12 201722
13 201121
14 201920
15 201919
16 200717
17 202115
18 20219
19 20197
20 20136

About E. Hampton Sessions

E. Hampton Sessions is a scholar working on Organic Chemistry, Geriatrics and Gerontology, Molecular Biology, Cancer Research and Immunology, having authored 21 papers that have together received 702 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Organic Chemistry Synthesis Methods (5 papers), Synthesis and biological activity (5 papers), Protein Kinase Regulation and GTPase Signaling (4 papers), Steroid Chemistry and Biochemistry (3 papers), Sirtuins and Resveratrol in Medicine (3 papers), NF-κB Signaling Pathways (2 papers), Ubiquitin and proteasome pathways (2 papers) and Pluripotent Stem Cells Research (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Geriatrics and Gerontology (119 citations), Organic Chemistry (281 citations), Molecular Biology (227 citations), Computational Theory and Mathematics (43 citations) and Aging (4 citations). E. Hampton Sessions has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Japan and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Dennis L. Wright, Ion Ghiviriga, Peter Alan Jacobi, Claudia H. Ruiz, Jennifer R. Pocas, Thomas Schröter, Thomas D. Bannister, Michael D. Cameron, Philip V. LoGrasso and Lin Li. Their work appears in journals such as Bioorganic & Medicinal Chemistry Letters, Organic Letters, Nature Communications, ACS Medicinal Chemistry Letters and Cancer Letters.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact