T. Luda

898 citations
21 papers · 332 · h-index 9

Impact in

Papers in

T. Luda

21 papers receiving 331 citations

Peers

T. Luda
Comparison fields: 5 of 28
  • Nuclear and High Energy Physics 302
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics 104
  • Aerospace Engineering 87
  • Materials Chemistry 138
  • Biomedical Engineering 83
Replace J.L. Barr with:
J.L. Barr United States
Hyunsun Han South Korea
O. Kudláček Germany
G. McArdle United Kingdom
T. Ravensbergen France
A. Goodyear United Kingdom
Y. Yang China
M. Romanelli United Kingdom
I.S. Carvalho Portugal
W. Yan China
T. Luda relative to J.L. Barr United States J.L. Barr's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2×2.4×
J.L. Barr · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by T. Luda

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of T. Luda's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by T. Luda with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites T. Luda more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by T. Luda

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by T. Luda. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by T. Luda. The network helps show where T. Luda may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside T. Luda, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with T. Luda Line = papers co-authored together T. Luda links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 21 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201799
2 202052
3 202132
4 202229
5 202219
6 202317
7 202114
8 202311
9 20249
10 20248
11 20218
12 20217
13 20235
14 20245
15 20234
16 20244
17 20243
18 20252
19 20202
20 20251

About T. Luda

T. Luda is a scholar working on Nuclear and High Energy Physics, Materials Chemistry, Astronomy and Astrophysics, Biomedical Engineering and Aerospace Engineering, having authored 21 papers that have together received 332 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Magnetic confinement fusion research (19 papers), Fusion materials and technologies (14 papers), Superconducting Materials and Applications (7 papers), Ionosphere and magnetosphere dynamics (7 papers), Particle accelerators and beam dynamics (3 papers), Plasma Diagnostics and Applications (2 papers), Laser-Plasma Interactions and Diagnostics (2 papers) and Nuclear Materials and Properties (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Nuclear and High Energy Physics (302 citations), Astronomy and Astrophysics (104 citations), Aerospace Engineering (87 citations), Materials Chemistry (138 citations) and Biomedical Engineering (83 citations). T. Luda has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, United States and France. Frequent co-authors include E. Fable, C. Angioni, G. Tardini, N. Bonanomi, G. M. Staebler, M. Dunne, P. A. Schneider, P.B. Snyder, L. L. Lao and E. A. Belli. Their work appears in journals such as Nuclear Fusion, Plasma Physics and Controlled Fusion, Nuclear Materials and Energy, Journal of Fusion Energy and Fusion Engineering and Design.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact