E. David Ford

6.4k citations
92 papers · 4.2k · h-index 35

Impact in

Papers in

E. David Ford

89 papers receiving 3.5k citations

Peers

E. David Ford
Comparison fields: 5 of 133
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation 2.4k
  • Global and Planetary Change 2.0k
  • Plant Science 1.1k
  • Soil Science 267
  • Ecology 676
Replace Kyoji Yoda with:
Kyoji Yoda Japan
Toshihiko Hara Japan
André Bouchard Canada
Hiroaki T. Ishii Japan
N. C. Kenkel Canada
Sylvain Delagrange Canada
Roderick C. Dewar Australia
Mark C. Vanderwel Canada
Takashi Kohyama Japan
Karen A. Harper Canada
E. David Ford relative to Kyoji Yoda Japan Kyoji Yoda's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3×4×5×
Kyoji Yoda · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by E. David Ford

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of E. David Ford's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by E. David Ford with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites E. David Ford more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by E. David Ford

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by E. David Ford. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by E. David Ford. The network helps show where E. David Ford may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside E. David Ford, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with E. David Ford Line = papers co-authored together E. David Ford links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 92 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1975380
2 2006300
3 1982233
4 1978204
5 1981200
6 1984176
7 1993134
8 1977113
9 200790
10 198483
11 198282
12 198271
13
Branching, crown structure and the control of timber production
198569
14 200566
15 197064
16 197161
17 199061
18
The ecology of even-aged forest plantations.
197961
19 200160
20 197760

About E. David Ford

E. David Ford is a scholar working on Nature and Landscape Conservation, Global and Planetary Change, Atmospheric Science, Plant Science and Insect Science, having authored 92 papers that have together received 4.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Forest ecology and management (44 papers), Plant Water Relations and Carbon Dynamics (29 papers), Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (24 papers), Tree-ring climate responses (15 papers), Tree Root and Stability Studies (11 papers), Greenhouse Technology and Climate Control (9 papers), Forest Management and Policy (9 papers) and Forest Ecology and Biodiversity Studies (7 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Nature and Landscape Conservation (2.4k citations), Global and Planetary Change (2.0k citations), Plant Science (1.1k citations), Soil Science (267 citations) and Ecology (676 citations). E. David Ford has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Japan. Frequent co-authors include J.D. Deans, T. Persson, Eric Renshaw, Hiroaki T. Ishii, Peter John Diggle, Palmer J. Newbould, Joel Howard Reynolds, Maureen C. Kennedy, Melvin G. R. Cannell and PETER ROTHERY. Their work appears in journals such as Tree Physiology, Journal of Applied Ecology, Annals of Botany, Journal of Ecology and Forestry An International Journal of Forest Research.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact