E. Calabrese

10 papers receiving 328 citations

Peers

E. Calabrese
Comparison fields: 5 of 56
  • Computer Science Applications 118
  • Software 30
  • Ceramics and Composites 42
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 63
  • Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials 90
Replace Po-Jui Chiang with:
Po-Jui Chiang Taiwan
R. J. Roedel United States
Sunghun Kim South Korea
Natalia Silvis-Cividjian Netherlands
Sophia Gershman United States
Dongjo Shin South Korea
R. Imura Japan
M. Kaniewska Poland
K H Reich Switzerland
M. El Yadari Morocco
E. Calabrese relative to Po-Jui Chiang Taiwan Po-Jui Chiang's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10.7×
Po-Jui Chiang · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by E. Calabrese

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of E. Calabrese's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by E. Calabrese with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites E. Calabrese more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by E. Calabrese

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by E. Calabrese. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by E. Calabrese. The network helps show where E. Calabrese may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 11 scholars most cited alongside E. Calabrese, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with E. Calabrese Line = papers co-authored together E. Calabrese links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

10 of 10 papers shown
#Work
1 1997124
2 197890
3 198857
4 197333
5 197326
6 198623
7 19842
8 19862
9 19891
10 19841

About E. Calabrese

E. Calabrese is a scholar working on Materials Chemistry, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment, Ceramics and Composites and Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials, having authored 10 papers that have together received 359 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Iron oxide chemistry and applications (4 papers), Magnetic Properties and Synthesis of Ferrites (4 papers), Solid-state spectroscopy and crystallography (2 papers), Multiferroics and related materials (2 papers), Glass properties and applications (2 papers), Minerals Flotation and Separation Techniques (1 paper), Ancient and Medieval Archaeology Studies (1 paper) and Advanced Physical and Chemical Molecular Interactions (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Computer Science Applications (118 citations), Software (30 citations), Ceramics and Composites (42 citations), Developmental and Educational Psychology (63 citations) and Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials (90 citations). E. Calabrese has collaborated with scholars based in Italy, United States and Slovakia. Frequent co-authors include W. Beall Fowler, Peter Brusilovsky, Jozef Hvorecký, Philip L. Miller, A. Deriu, G. Albanese, F. Licci, A. Paoluzi, O. Može and G. Turilli. Their work appears in journals such as physica status solidi (b), Education and Information Technologies, Journal of Applied Physics, Physical review. B, Condensed matter and Hyperfine Interactions.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact