E. Andrew

662 citations
37 papers · 570 · h-index 14

Impact in

Papers in

E. Andrew

33 papers receiving 473 citations

Peers

E. Andrew
Comparison fields: 5 of 84
  • Nephrology 153
  • Internal Medicine 18
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 107
  • Emergency Medicine 32
  • Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine 16
Replace Thomas R. Kelly with:
Thomas R. Kelly United States
Michael F. Hartshorne United States
Suzanne El‐Sayegh United States
Narender Annapureddy United States
Sharif Al‐Ruzzeh United Kingdom
Eugene B. Wu China
Rita Camporotondo Italy
Nicole Yarid United States
Thomas M. Durant United States
Harlinde Peperstraete Belgium
E. Andrew relative to Thomas R. Kelly United States Thomas R. Kelly's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×1.8×
Thomas R. Kelly · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by E. Andrew

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of E. Andrew's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by E. Andrew with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites E. Andrew more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by E. Andrew

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by E. Andrew. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by E. Andrew. The network helps show where E. Andrew may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside E. Andrew, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with E. Andrew Line = papers co-authored together E. Andrew links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 37 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 196588
2 199273
3 199039
4 199535
5 199133
6 199831
7 197728
8 198725
9 200620
10 199420
11 198419
12 199017
13 199313
14 198313
15
Intravascular studies with iohexol (Omnipaque). Results from the first 49 clinical trials.
198512
16 199011
17 197910
18 19859
19
Pharmacokinetics of iopentol in healthy volunteers.
19879
20 19828

About E. Andrew

E. Andrew is a scholar working on Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Nephrology, Materials Chemistry, Neurology and Biomedical Engineering, having authored 37 papers that have together received 570 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Lanthanide and Transition Metal Complexes (8 papers), Acute Kidney Injury Research (8 papers), Cardiac Imaging and Diagnostics (8 papers), Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications (7 papers), Traumatic Brain Injury and Neurovascular Disturbances (5 papers), Radiation Dose and Imaging (4 papers), MRI in cancer diagnosis (3 papers) and Venous Thromboembolism Diagnosis and Management (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Nephrology (153 citations), Internal Medicine (18 citations), Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (107 citations), Emergency Medicine (32 citations) and Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine (16 citations). E. Andrew has collaborated with scholars based in Norway, United States and Switzerland. Frequent co-authors include M. G. Svaland, William O. Berndt, D. Hoefnagel, Jon Ø. Nossen, K. J. Berg, Tanweer Haider, Petter‐Arnt Hals, Jarl Å. Jakobsen, K. Levorstad and Ivar Enge. Their work appears in journals such as Acta Radiologica, Investigative Radiology, Clinical Toxicology, Radiology and British Journal of Radiology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact