Dylan Eikelenboom

535 citations
7 papers · 433 · h-index 6

Impact in

Papers in

Dylan Eikelenboom

7 papers receiving 426 citations

Peers

Dylan Eikelenboom
Comparison fields: 5 of 63
  • Biomedical Engineering 303
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 110
  • Biotechnology 35
  • Hepatology 24
  • Structural Biology 4
Replace Lifang Jin with:
Lifang Jin China
Eric C. Pua United States
Samantha DʼAndrea United States
Frank Winterroth United States
Tejaswi Worlikar United States
Jochen Huppert Germany
Philippe Bussat Switzerland
Sunil Unnikrishnan United States
Silüe Zeng China
Joke Deprez Belgium
Dylan Eikelenboom relative to Lifang Jin China Lifang Jin's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Lifang Jin · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Dylan Eikelenboom

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Dylan Eikelenboom's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Dylan Eikelenboom with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Dylan Eikelenboom more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Dylan Eikelenboom

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Dylan Eikelenboom. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Dylan Eikelenboom. The network helps show where Dylan Eikelenboom may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 14 scholars most cited alongside Dylan Eikelenboom, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Dylan Eikelenboom Line = papers co-authored together Dylan Eikelenboom links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

7 of 7 papers shown
#Work
1 2016230
2 2015119
3 201636
4 201523
5 201716
6 20178
7 20161

About Dylan Eikelenboom

Dylan Eikelenboom is a scholar working on Biomedical Engineering, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Biomaterials, Cell Biology and Biotechnology, having authored 7 papers that have together received 433 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Ultrasound and Hyperthermia Applications (7 papers), Ultrasound Imaging and Elastography (3 papers), Photoacoustic and Ultrasonic Imaging (2 papers), Microbial Inactivation Methods (1 paper), Effects of Radiation Exposure (1 paper), Tendon Structure and Treatment (1 paper), Nanoplatforms for cancer theranostics (1 paper) and Nanoparticle-Based Drug Delivery (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Biomedical Engineering (303 citations), Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (110 citations), Biotechnology (35 citations), Hepatology (24 citations) and Structural Biology (4 citations). Dylan Eikelenboom has collaborated with scholars based in Netherlands, United States and France. Frequent co-authors include Martijn H. den Brok, Jurgen J. Fütterer, Martijn Hoogenboom, Gosse J. Adema, Renske J.E. van den Bijgaart, Arend Heerschap, Pieter Wesseling, Erik Dumont, Melissa Wassink and Andor Veltien. Their work appears in journals such as Ultrasonics Sonochemistry, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, Cancer Immunology Immunotherapy, Ultrasound in Medicine & Biology and Journal of Therapeutic Ultrasound.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact