Douglas E. Pyott
Impact in
- Plant Science top 5%
- Plant Virus Research Studies
- Plant Molecular Biology Research
- Chromosomal and Genetic Variations
Papers in
-
- Plant Virus Research Studies 6
- Chromosomal and Genetic Variations 4
- Plant Molecular Biology Research 3
- Light effects on plants 1
-
- CRISPR and Genetic Engineering 4
- Photosynthetic Processes and Mechanisms 2
- Co-authors
- Attila Molnár (6 shared papers)Emma Sheehan (1 shared paper)Keara A. Franklin (1 shared paper)Gabriela Toledo‐Ortiz (1 shared paper)Karen Halliday (1 shared paper)Laurine Gilles (1 shared paper)Jean‐Pierre Martinant (1 shared paper)Thomas Widiez (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- New Phytologist (2 papers)Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (1 paper)Plant Biotechnology Journal (1 paper)Molecular Plant Pathology (1 paper)Journal of Experimental Botany (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomCzechiaFrance
In The Last Decade
Douglas E. Pyott
8 papers receiving 777 citations
Douglas E. Pyott's Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 55
- Business and International Management 41
- Plant Science 541
- Aging 20
- Insect Science 119
- Molecular Biology 632
Countries citing papers authored by Douglas E. Pyott
This map shows the geographic impact of Douglas E. Pyott's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Douglas E. Pyott with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Douglas E. Pyott more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Douglas E. Pyott
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Douglas E. Pyott. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Douglas E. Pyott. The network helps show where Douglas E. Pyott may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 11 scholars most cited alongside Douglas E. Pyott, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Engineering of CRISPR/Cas9‐mediated potyvirus resistance in transgene‐free Arabidopsis plants Hit paper breakdown → | 2016 | 329 |
| 2 | 2017 | 181 | |
| 3 | 2014 | 107 | |
| 4 | 2020 | 99 | |
| 5 | 2015 | 43 | |
| 6 | 2021 | 21 | |
| 7 | 2022 | 19 | |
| 8 | 2020 | 2 |
About Douglas E. Pyott
Douglas E. Pyott is a scholar working on Plant Science, Molecular Biology, Biotechnology, Insect Science and Infectious Diseases, having authored 8 papers that have together received 801 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Plant Virus Research Studies (6 papers), Chromosomal and Genetic Variations (4 papers), CRISPR and Genetic Engineering (4 papers), Plant Molecular Biology Research (3 papers), Photosynthetic Processes and Mechanisms (2 papers), Light effects on plants (1 paper), Insect symbiosis and bacterial influences (1 paper) and Transgenic Plants and Applications (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Business and International Management (41 citations), Plant Science (541 citations), Aging (20 citations), Insect Science (119 citations) and Molecular Biology (632 citations). Douglas E. Pyott has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Czechia and France. Frequent co-authors include Attila Molnár, Emma Sheehan, Keara A. Franklin, Gabriela Toledo‐Ortiz, Karen Halliday, Laurine Gilles, Jean‐Pierre Martinant, Thomas Widiez, Peter Rogowsky and Andrew Bassett. Their work appears in journals such as New Phytologist, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Plant Biotechnology Journal, Molecular Plant Pathology and Journal of Experimental Botany.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.