Doug Pitt
Impact in
-
- Forest ecology and management
- Environmental Engineering top 0.5%
- Remote Sensing and LiDAR Applications
Papers in
-
- Forest ecology and management 24
- Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies 9
- Seedling growth and survival studies 6
-
- Forest Ecology and Biodiversity Studies 17
- Co-authors
- Murray Woods (8 shared papers)Frederick W. Bell (9 shared papers)Douglas J. King (4 shared papers)Darren Pouliot (4 shared papers)Mikko Vastaranta (2 shared papers)Joanne C. White (2 shared papers)Nicholas C. Coops (2 shared papers)Michael A. Wulder (2 shared papers)
- Journals
- The Forestry Chronicle (16 papers)Canadian Journal of Forest Research (13 papers)Telecommunications Policy (3 papers)Forest Ecology and Management (3 papers)Geoderma (2 papers)
- Partner nations
- CanadaUnited StatesIndia
In The Last Decade
Doug Pitt
56 papers receiving 2.0k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 70
- Nature and Landscape Conservation 1.2k
- Environmental Engineering 1.4k
- Insect Science 869
- Ecology 919
- Geology 202
Countries citing papers authored by Doug Pitt
This map shows the geographic impact of Doug Pitt's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Doug Pitt with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Doug Pitt more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Doug Pitt
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Doug Pitt. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Doug Pitt. The network helps show where Doug Pitt may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Doug Pitt, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 56 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2002 | 336 | |
| 2 | 2013 | 280 | |
| 3 | 2013 | 272 | |
| 4 | 2011 | 129 | |
| 5 | 2012 | 125 | |
| 6 | 2008 | 106 | |
| 7 | 2014 | 71 | |
| 8 | 2008 | 67 | |
| 9 | 2011 | 62 | |
| 10 | 2005 | 54 | |
| 11 | 2014 | 52 | |
| 12 | 1997 | 49 | |
| 13 | 2008 | 48 | |
| 14 | 1999 | 39 | |
| 15 | 2014 | 39 | |
| 16 | 2006 | 27 | |
| 17 | 2000 | 22 | |
| 18 | 1999 | 21 | |
| 19 | 2009 | 21 | |
| 20 | 2013 | 20 |
About Doug Pitt
Doug Pitt is a scholar working on Nature and Landscape Conservation, Insect Science, Environmental Engineering, Ecology and Global and Planetary Change, having authored 56 papers that have together received 2.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Forest ecology and management (24 papers), Forest Ecology and Biodiversity Studies (17 papers), Remote Sensing and LiDAR Applications (16 papers), Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (9 papers), Fire effects on ecosystems (7 papers), Forest Biomass Utilization and Management (6 papers), Weed Control and Herbicide Applications (6 papers) and Seedling growth and survival studies (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Nature and Landscape Conservation (1.2k citations), Environmental Engineering (1.4k citations), Insect Science (869 citations), Ecology (919 citations) and Geology (202 citations). Doug Pitt has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, United States and India. Frequent co-authors include Murray Woods, Frederick W. Bell, Douglas J. King, Darren Pouliot, Mikko Vastaranta, Joanne C. White, Nicholas C. Coops, Michael A. Wulder, Paul Treitz and Kevin Lim. Their work appears in journals such as The Forestry Chronicle, Canadian Journal of Forest Research, Telecommunications Policy, Forest Ecology and Management and Geoderma.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.