Donald Smith

32 papers receiving 1.5k citations

Donald Smith's Hit Papers

KNOWLEDGE AND LOTTERIES 2005 · 809 citations
8090+7+14Years since publication250500750

Peers

Donald Smith
Comparison fields: 5 of 146
  • Philosophy 793
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 504
  • Pharmaceutical Science 165
  • History and Philosophy of Science 138
  • Family Practice 43
Replace Joseph Almog with:
Joseph Almog Israel
Ingvar Johansson Sweden
David Saunders United Kingdom
Steven Verheyen Belgium
Sylvia Wenmackers Belgium
Karel Lambert United States
Naoki Fukui Japan
Mamoru Saitō Japan
Andreas Lange Germany
Michel Bitbol France
Donald Smith relative to Joseph Almog Israel Joseph Almog's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5×10×15×21.5×
Joseph Almog · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Donald Smith

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Donald Smith's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Donald Smith with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Donald Smith more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Donald Smith

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Donald Smith. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Donald Smith. The network helps show where Donald Smith may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Donald Smith, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Donald Smith Line = papers co-authored together Donald Smith links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 37 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1
KNOWLEDGE AND LOTTERIES
Hit paper breakdown →
2005809
2 1987139
3 1984139
4 1991131
5 2009126
6 200999
7 199136
8 200332
9 195432
10 200528
11 200828
12 199425
13 201518
14 198117
15 198716
16
All This Stuff : Archiving the Artist
201310
17 19999
18 20188
19 20067
20 20076

About Donald Smith

Donald Smith is a scholar working on Philosophy, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Surgery, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics and Cognitive Neuroscience, having authored 37 papers that have together received 1.8k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Philosophy and Theoretical Science (5 papers), Free Will and Agency (3 papers), Diabetes Management and Research (3 papers), Risk and Safety Analysis (2 papers), Biblical Studies and Interpretation (2 papers), Diabetes and associated disorders (2 papers), Force Microscopy Techniques and Applications (2 papers) and Drug Solubulity and Delivery Systems (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Philosophy (793 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (504 citations), Pharmaceutical Science (165 citations), History and Philosophy of Science (138 citations) and Family Practice (43 citations). Donald Smith has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Germany and New Zealand. Frequent co-authors include Lauretta Quinn, Ali Çınar, Everett Hiestand, C. F. Quate, Jürgen P. Rabe, J. D. Swalen, Christoph Gerber, G. Binnig, Theodor W. Hänsch and Wolfgang M. Heckl. Their work appears in journals such as International Journal of Pharmaceutics, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Journal of Nutrition and Water Science & Technology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact