Donald Smith

31 papers receiving 1.3k citations

Donald Smith's Hit Papers

KNOWLEDGE AND LOTTERIES 2005 · 632 citations
6320+7+14Years since publication200400600

Peers

Donald Smith
Comparison fields: 5 of 143
  • Philosophy 638
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 417
  • Family Practice 40
  • Pharmaceutical Science 145
  • History and Philosophy of Science 103
Replace Joseph Almog with:
Joseph Almog Israel
David Saunders United Kingdom
Ingvar Johansson Sweden
Sylvia Wenmackers Belgium
Evan Harris Walker United States
Naoki Fukui Japan
Mark Balaguer United States
Steven Verheyen Belgium
John Palmer United States
Mark T. Nelson United Kingdom
Donald Smith relative to Joseph Almog Israel Joseph Almog's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×15×20×
Joseph Almog · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Donald Smith

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Donald Smith's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Donald Smith with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Donald Smith more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Donald Smith

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Donald Smith. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Donald Smith. The network helps show where Donald Smith may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Donald Smith, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Donald Smith Line = papers co-authored together Donald Smith links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 34 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1
KNOWLEDGE AND LOTTERIES
Hit paper breakdown →
2005632
2 1984124
3 1991118
4 2009114
5 1987113
6 200991
7 199129
8 200828
9 195425
10 200524
11 200323
12 199421
13 201518
14 198117
15 198716
16 19999
17
All This Stuff : Archiving the Artist
20138
18 20188
19 19926
20 20066

About Donald Smith

Donald Smith is a scholar working on Philosophy, Surgery, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics and Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, having authored 34 papers that have together received 1.5k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Philosophy and Theoretical Science (4 papers), Diabetes Management and Research (3 papers), Risk and Safety Analysis (2 papers), Diabetes and associated disorders (2 papers), Force Microscopy Techniques and Applications (2 papers), Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics (2 papers), Drug Solubulity and Delivery Systems (2 papers) and Free Will and Agency (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Philosophy (638 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (417 citations), Family Practice (40 citations), Pharmaceutical Science (145 citations) and History and Philosophy of Science (103 citations). Donald Smith has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Germany and New Zealand. Frequent co-authors include Lauretta Quinn, Ali Çınar, Wolfgang M. Heckl, Everett Hiestand, John H. Maddocks, Theodor W. Hänsch, G. Binnig, Christoph Gerber, Jürgen P. Rabe and J. D. Swalen. Their work appears in journals such as Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, International Journal of Pharmaceutics, The FASEB Journal and Science.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact