Donald E. Selby

401 citations
7 papers · 319 · h-index 6

Impact in

Papers in

Donald E. Selby

7 papers receiving 313 citations

Peers

Donald E. Selby
Comparison fields: 5 of 47
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 194
  • Complementary and alternative medicine 29
  • Molecular Biology 85
  • Nephrology 8
  • Physiology 29
Replace Tatiana Tsvetkova with:
Tatiana Tsvetkova United States
M. M. Redfield United States
Duška Glavaš Croatia
Sandra de Zeeuw Netherlands
Takuya Shida Japan
Stephen S. Gottlieb United States
Carl Hayward United Kingdom
E. Roig Spain
Shijie Zhao China
Johan Defoor Belgium
Donald E. Selby relative to Tatiana Tsvetkova United States Tatiana Tsvetkova's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Tatiana Tsvetkova · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Donald E. Selby

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Donald E. Selby's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Donald E. Selby with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Donald E. Selby more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Donald E. Selby

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Donald E. Selby. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Donald E. Selby. The network helps show where Donald E. Selby may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 20 scholars most cited alongside Donald E. Selby, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Donald E. Selby Line = papers co-authored together Donald E. Selby links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

7 of 7 papers shown
#Work
1 201199
2 201791
3 200980
4 201025
5 200911
6 20119
7 20224

About Donald E. Selby

Donald E. Selby is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Nephrology, Genetics and Pathology and Forensic Medicine, having authored 7 papers that have together received 319 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Cardiovascular Function and Risk Factors (2 papers), RNA and protein synthesis mechanisms (1 paper), Cardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmias (1 paper), Congenital heart defects research (1 paper), 3D Printing in Biomedical Research (1 paper), Acute Kidney Injury Research (1 paper), Advanced biosensing and bioanalysis techniques (1 paper) and Chromosomal and Genetic Variations (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (194 citations), Complementary and alternative medicine (29 citations), Molecular Biology (85 citations), Nephrology (8 citations) and Physiology (29 citations). Donald E. Selby has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Martin M. LeWinter, Bradley M. Palmer, Markus Meyer, Stephen P. Bell, Peter VanBuren, Mark S. Miller, Michael J. Toth, David W. Maughan, Stewart H. Lecker and Philip A. Ades. Their work appears in journals such as Circulation Heart Failure, Journal of the American College of Cardiology, Journal of Molecular and Cellular Cardiology, JACC: Cardiovascular Interventions and Antioxidants and Redox Signaling.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact