Donald Bogle
Impact in
- Music top 1%
- Music History and Culture
- Theater, Performance, and Music History
- Gender Studies top 5%
- Media, Gender, and Advertising
- Gender, Feminism, and Media
Papers in
-
- Race, History, and American Society 2
- Cuban History and Society 1
-
- Asian Culture and Media Studies 1
- Caribbean history, culture, and politics 1
- Asian American and Pacific Histories 1
- Co-authors
- Edward Mapp (2 shared papers)Thomas Cripps (1 shared paper)Earl Conrad (1 shared paper)Jim Pines (1 shared paper)Alan O’Connor (1 shared paper)Kathryn Montgomery (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Cinema Journal (1 paper)The English Journal (1 paper)Communication Booknotes (1 paper)Black American Literature Forum (1 paper)Continuum eBooks (1 paper)
In The Last Decade
Donald Bogle
9 papers receiving 359 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 51
- Music 94
- Gender Studies 174
- Literature and Literary Theory 104
- Communication 58
- Visual Arts and Performing Arts 36
Countries citing papers authored by Donald Bogle
This map shows the geographic impact of Donald Bogle's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Donald Bogle with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Donald Bogle more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Donald Bogle
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Donald Bogle. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Donald Bogle. The network helps show where Donald Bogle may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 6 scholars most cited alongside Donald Bogle, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Toms, Coons, Mulattoes, Mammies, and Bucks: An Interpretive History of Blacks in American Films | 1973 | 283 |
| 2 | 1974 | 138 | |
| 3 | Toms, Coons, Mulattoes, Mammies, & Bucks: An Interpretive History of Blacks in American Films. New Expanded Edition. | 1992 | 102 |
| 4 | 1976 | 16 | |
| 5 | Brown sugar: Eighty years of America's Black female superstars | 1980 | 11 |
| 6 | Bright Boulevards, Bold Dreams: The Story of Black Hollywood | 2005 | 9 |
| 7 | 1991 | 6 | |
| 8 | 2007 | 4 | |
| 9 | 1990 | 2 |
About Donald Bogle
Donald Bogle is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Cultural Studies, Economics and Econometrics, Infectious Diseases and Organic Chemistry, having authored 9 papers that have together received 571 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Race, History, and American Society (2 papers), Asian Culture and Media Studies (1 paper), Cinema and Media Studies (1 paper), Caribbean history, culture, and politics (1 paper), Cuban History and Society (1 paper) and Asian American and Pacific Histories (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Music (94 citations), Gender Studies (174 citations), Literature and Literary Theory (104 citations), Communication (58 citations) and Visual Arts and Performing Arts (36 citations). Frequent co-authors include Edward Mapp, Thomas Cripps, Earl Conrad, Jim Pines, Alan O’Connor and Kathryn Montgomery. Their work appears in journals such as Cinema Journal, The English Journal, Communication Booknotes, Black American Literature Forum and Continuum eBooks.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.