Don Stemen

568 citations
26 papers · 352 · h-index 13

Impact in

Papers in

Don Stemen

24 papers receiving 308 citations

Peers

Don Stemen
Comparison fields: 5 of 35
  • Sociology and Political Science 312
  • Clinical Psychology 121
  • General Health Professions 98
  • Law 29
  • Statistics and Probability 19
Replace Kevin R. Reitz with:
Kevin R. Reitz United States
Valerie West United States
Heather Schoenfeld United States
Paula Kautt United Kingdom
Carol Hedderman United Kingdom
Stephanie Bontrager United States
Natalie Goulette United States
Ronald G. Helms United States
Issa Kohler‐Hausmann United States
Noah Painter‐Davis United States
Don Stemen relative to Kevin R. Reitz United States Kevin R. Reitz's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.8×
Kevin R. Reitz · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Don Stemen

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Don Stemen's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Don Stemen with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Don Stemen more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Don Stemen

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Don Stemen. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Don Stemen. The network helps show where Don Stemen may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 8 scholars most cited alongside Don Stemen, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Don Stemen Line = papers co-authored together Don Stemen links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 26 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 200251
2 201032
3 200231
4 200724
5 201824
6
The Prison Paradox: More Incarceration Will Not Make Us Safer
201722
7 201721
8 200417
9 201117
10 201416
11
The Anatomy of Discretion: An Analysis of Prosecutorial Decision Making Technical Report.
201215
12 201214
13 201013
14 202012
15 20098
16 20127
17 20046
18 20105
19
Beyond the War: The Evolving Nature of the U.S. Approach to Drugs
20174
20 20023

About Don Stemen

Don Stemen is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, General Health Professions, Clinical Psychology, Economics and Econometrics and Law, having authored 26 papers that have together received 352 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis (19 papers), Crime Patterns and Interventions (14 papers), Homelessness and Social Issues (5 papers), Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending (5 papers), Advanced Causal Inference Techniques (4 papers), Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes (3 papers), Policing Practices and Perceptions (2 papers) and Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Sociology and Political Science (312 citations), Clinical Psychology (121 citations), General Health Professions (98 citations), Law (29 citations) and Statistics and Probability (19 citations). Don Stemen has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Netherlands and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Andrés F. Rengifo, Jon R. Sorensen, Ryan C. Meldrum, Besiki Luka Kutateladze, Kecia R. Johnson, Karen Heimer, Joseph B. Lang and David E. Olson. Their work appears in journals such as Crime & Delinquency, Journal of Criminal Justice, Justice Quarterly, Evaluation Review and Journal of Quantitative Criminology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact