Don Box
Impact in
- Artificial Intelligence top 5%
- Advanced Software Engineering Methodologies
- Logic, programming, and type systems
- Software top 10%
- Model-Driven Software Engineering Techniques
Papers in
- Software 5
- Engineering and Information Technology 4
- Model-Driven Software Engineering Techniques 1
-
- Advanced Software Engineering Methodologies 6
- Logic, programming, and type systems 1
- Journals
- CERN Document Server (European Organization for Nuclear Research) (1 paper)International Linear Collider (2 papers)Medical Entomology and Zoology (2 papers)Companion to the ACM SIGPLAN Conference on Object-Oriented Programming, Systems, Languages, and Applications (OOPSLA Companion) (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
Don Box
7 papers receiving 285 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 44
- Artificial Intelligence 212
- Software 30
- Hardware and Architecture 35
- Computer Networks and Communications 62
- Information Systems 46
Countries citing papers authored by Don Box
This map shows the geographic impact of Don Box's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Don Box with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Don Box more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Don Box
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Don Box. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Don Box. The network helps show where Don Box may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 3 scholars most cited alongside Don Box, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Essential COM | 1997 | 287 |
| 2 | Essential .NET: The Common Language Runtime | 2002 | 38 |
| 3 | Essential XML: Beyond MarkUp | 2000 | 16 |
| 4 | 2004 | 6 | |
| 5 | Understanding Microsoft Windows 2000 distributed services | 2000 | 2 |
| 6 | Programming Distributed Applications with Com+ and Microsoft Visual Basic 6.0, Second Edition | 2000 | 2 |
| 7 | The Oslo Modeling Language: Draft Specification - October 2008 | 2008 | 2 |
| 8 | Effective COM: 50 Ways to Improve Your COM and MTS-based Applications | 2008 | 0 |
About Don Box
Don Box is a scholar working on Software, Artificial Intelligence, Computer Networks and Communications, Information Systems and Nuclear Energy and Engineering, having authored 8 papers that have together received 353 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Advanced Software Engineering Methodologies (6 papers), Engineering and Information Technology (4 papers), Distributed systems and fault tolerance (2 papers), Web Applications and Data Management (2 papers), Distributed and Parallel Computing Systems (1 paper), Advanced Database Systems and Queries (1 paper), Logic, programming, and type systems (1 paper) and Model-Driven Software Engineering Techniques (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Artificial Intelligence (212 citations), Software (30 citations), Hardware and Architecture (35 citations), Computer Networks and Communications (62 citations) and Information Systems (46 citations). Don Box has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Grady Booch, John Crupi and Anders Hejlsberg. Their work appears in journals such as CERN Document Server (European Organization for Nuclear Research), International Linear Collider, Medical Entomology and Zoology and Companion to the ACM SIGPLAN Conference on Object-Oriented Programming, Systems, Languages, and Applications (OOPSLA Companion).
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.