Dominic Eberle

738 citations
8 papers · 591 · h-index 8

Impact in

Papers in

Dominic Eberle

8 papers receiving 579 citations

Peers

Dominic Eberle
Comparison fields: 5 of 58
  • Developmental Neuroscience 55
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 166
  • Structural Biology 12
  • Molecular Biology 470
  • Biophysics 31
Replace Gonzalo Rosso with:
Gonzalo Rosso Germany
Joseph K. Antonios United States
Sunjong Kwon United States
Bao Kim Nguyen United States
Maxime Feyeux France
Naoki Nishishita Japan
Sarah K. Foster United Kingdom
Whitney Cary United States
Manuela Völkner Germany
Koray Dogan Kaya United States
Dominic Eberle relative to Gonzalo Rosso Germany Gonzalo Rosso's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3×4.4×
Gonzalo Rosso · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Dominic Eberle

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Dominic Eberle's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Dominic Eberle with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Dominic Eberle more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Dominic Eberle

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Dominic Eberle. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Dominic Eberle. The network helps show where Dominic Eberle may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Dominic Eberle, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Dominic Eberle Line = papers co-authored together Dominic Eberle links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

8 of 8 papers shown
#Work
1 2016191
2 2014167
3 201184
4 201260
5 201437
6 201226
7 201414
8 202012

About Dominic Eberle

Dominic Eberle is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Cell Biology, Developmental Neuroscience and Biomedical Engineering, having authored 8 papers that have together received 591 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Neuroscience and Neural Engineering (5 papers), Retinal Development and Disorders (4 papers), Photoreceptor and optogenetics research (3 papers), Neurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanisms (2 papers), Cellular Mechanics and Interactions (2 papers), Elasticity and Material Modeling (1 paper), Advanced Fluorescence Microscopy Techniques (1 paper) and Photosynthetic Processes and Mechanisms (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Developmental Neuroscience (55 citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (166 citations), Structural Biology (12 citations), Molecular Biology (470 citations) and Biophysics (31 citations). Dominic Eberle has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, United States and Switzerland. Frequent co-authors include Andrea Meinhardt, Elly M. Tanaka, Matthias P. Lütolf, Adrian Ranga, Marius Ader, Denis Corbeil, Massimiliano Caiazzo, Mehmet Girgin, Tiago Santos‐Ferreira and Akira Tazaki. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Visualized Experiments, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Stem Cell Reports, Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science and PLoS ONE.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact