Dilek Cindoğlu

555 citations
19 papers · 364 · h-index 11

Impact in

Papers in

Dilek Cindoğlu

16 papers receiving 313 citations

Peers

Dilek Cindoğlu
Comparison fields: 5 of 58
  • Gender Studies 202
  • Political Science and International Relations 167
  • Sociology and Political Science 141
  • Reproductive Medicine 14
  • Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health 29
Replace Beth Goldblatt with:
Beth Goldblatt Australia
Évelyne Lapierre‐Adamcyk Canada
Frances Olsen United States
Tyrene White United States
Donna Lee Bowen United States
W.C. Ultee Netherlands
Kerstin Ruckdeschel Germany
Анна Темкина Russia
Britta Hoem Sweden
Johanna Lammi-Taskula Finland
Dilek Cindoğlu relative to Beth Goldblatt Australia Beth Goldblatt's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.4×
Beth Goldblatt · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Dilek Cindoğlu

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Dilek Cindoğlu's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Dilek Cindoğlu with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Dilek Cindoğlu more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Dilek Cindoğlu

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Dilek Cindoğlu. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Dilek Cindoğlu. The network helps show where Dilek Cindoğlu may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 6 scholars most cited alongside Dilek Cindoğlu, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Dilek Cindoğlu Line = papers co-authored together Dilek Cindoğlu links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

19 of 19 papers shown
#Work
1 201691
2 199760
3 200833
4 200827
5 201327
6 201026
7 199922
8
Bridging the gender gap in Turkey : a milestone towards faster socio-economic development and poverty reduction
200319
9 201715
10 200111
11 200611
12 200210
13 20074
14 20153
15 20183
16 20122
17 20260
18 20240
19 20220

About Dilek Cindoğlu

Dilek Cindoğlu is a scholar working on Political Science and International Relations, Gender Studies, Sociology and Political Science, General Health Professions and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, having authored 19 papers that have together received 364 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Turkey's Politics and Society (11 papers), Gender Politics and Representation (8 papers), Historical Gender and Feminism Studies (3 papers), Demographic Trends and Gender Preferences (2 papers), Historical Turkish Studies (2 papers), Gender, Security, and Conflict (2 papers), Reproductive Health and Technologies (2 papers) and Global Health Care Issues (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Gender Studies (202 citations), Political Science and International Relations (167 citations), Sociology and Political Science (141 citations), Reproductive Medicine (14 citations) and Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health (29 citations). Dilek Cindoğlu has collaborated with scholars based in Türkiye, United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include İbrahim Sirkeci, Şule Toktaş, A. Nuray Karancı, Feride Acar, Ayşe Akın and Ayşe Güneş-Ayata. Their work appears in journals such as Women s Studies International Forum, Health Care For Women International, Middle Eastern Studies, Turkish Studies and Journal of Women Politics & Policy.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact