Dietmar Schulz
Impact in
- Plant Science top 10%
- Plant Molecular Biology Research
- Powdery Mildew Fungal Diseases
-
- Microbial bioremediation and biosurfactants
Papers in
-
- Powdery Mildew Fungal Diseases 6
- Plant Molecular Biology Research 3
- Flowering Plant Growth and Cultivation 3
- Berry genetics and cultivation research 3
- Plant nutrient uptake and metabolism 2
-
- Plant Gene Expression Analysis 3
- Plant Reproductive Biology 3
- Co-authors
- Thomas Debener (14 shared papers)Marcus Linde (7 shared papers)Roeland E. Voorrips (3 shared papers)M.J.M. Smulders (3 shared papers)Gerhard Wolf (2 shared papers)Traud Winkelmann (3 shared papers)Erich Kosiol (1 shared paper)C.F.S. Koning-Boucoiran (2 shared papers)
- Journals
- Frontiers in Plant Science (3 papers)Biological Control (1 paper)Molecular Breeding (1 paper)BMC Plant Biology (1 paper)PLoS ONE (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- GermanyNetherlandsIndonesia
In The Last Decade
Dietmar Schulz
17 papers receiving 256 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 47
- Plant Science 168
- Pollution 36
- Biochemistry 15
- Cell Biology 36
- Molecular Biology 121
Countries citing papers authored by Dietmar Schulz
This map shows the geographic impact of Dietmar Schulz's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Dietmar Schulz with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Dietmar Schulz more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Dietmar Schulz
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Dietmar Schulz. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Dietmar Schulz. The network helps show where Dietmar Schulz may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Dietmar Schulz, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2015 | 70 | |
| 2 | 2016 | 54 | |
| 3 | 1991 | 38 | |
| 4 | 2017 | 22 | |
| 5 | 2008 | 16 | |
| 6 | 2021 | 15 | |
| 7 | 2009 | 14 | |
| 8 | Handwörterbuch des Rechnungswesens | 1978 | 13 |
| 9 | 2013 | 10 | |
| 10 | 2023 | 7 | |
| 11 | 2007 | 5 | |
| 12 | 2015 | 5 | |
| 13 | 2010 | 4 | |
| 14 | 2023 | 3 | |
| 15 | 2023 | 2 | |
| 16 | 2009 | 2 | |
| 17 | 2024 | 1 | |
| 18 | 2025 | 0 |
About Dietmar Schulz
Dietmar Schulz is a scholar working on Plant Science, Molecular Biology, Genetics, Strategy and Management and Pollution, having authored 18 papers that have together received 281 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Powdery Mildew Fungal Diseases (6 papers), Plant Molecular Biology Research (3 papers), Flowering Plant Growth and Cultivation (3 papers), Plant Gene Expression Analysis (3 papers), Berry genetics and cultivation research (3 papers), Plant Reproductive Biology (3 papers), Genetic Mapping and Diversity in Plants and Animals (3 papers) and Plant nutrient uptake and metabolism (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Plant Science (168 citations), Pollution (36 citations), Biochemistry (15 citations), Cell Biology (36 citations) and Molecular Biology (121 citations). Dietmar Schulz has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, Netherlands and Indonesia. Frequent co-authors include Thomas Debener, Marcus Linde, Roeland E. Voorrips, M.J.M. Smulders, Gerhard Wolf, Traud Winkelmann, Erich Kosiol, C.F.S. Koning-Boucoiran, G. Esselink and Nhung Nguyen. Their work appears in journals such as Frontiers in Plant Science, Biological Control, Molecular Breeding, BMC Plant Biology and PLoS ONE.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.