Diele Lôbo
Impact in
-
- Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies
- Forest ecology and management
- Ecological Modeling top 10%
- Species Distribution and Climate Change
Papers in
-
- Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies 2
- Co-authors
- Marcelo Tabarelli (3 shared papers)Tarciso C. C. Leão (3 shared papers)Felipe P. L. Melo (1 shared paper)André Maurício Melo Santos (1 shared paper)Inara R. Leal (1 shared paper)Lorraine Scotson (1 shared paper)Alexandre Ardichvili (3 shared papers)Sílvia Pereira de Castro Casa Nova (2 shared papers)
- Journals
- Conservation Biology (2 papers)Ecological Economics (1 paper)Diversity and Distributions (1 paper)Biological Conservation (1 paper)Sustainability (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United StatesBrazilAustralia
In The Last Decade
Diele Lôbo
8 papers receiving 281 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 50
- Nature and Landscape Conservation 182
- Ecological Modeling 42
- Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 139
- Global and Planetary Change 102
- Forestry 17
Countries citing papers authored by Diele Lôbo
This map shows the geographic impact of Diele Lôbo's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Diele Lôbo with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Diele Lôbo more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Diele Lôbo
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Diele Lôbo. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Diele Lôbo. The network helps show where Diele Lôbo may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 20 scholars most cited alongside Diele Lôbo, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2011 | 236 | |
| 2 | 2011 | 19 | |
| 3 | 2017 | 16 | |
| 4 | 2022 | 5 | |
| 5 | Implementando reflorestamentos com alta diversidade na Zona da Mata Nordestina: guia prático | 2008 | 4 |
| 6 | 2024 | 3 | |
| 7 | 2024 | 3 | |
| 8 | 2023 | 1 | |
| 9 | 2023 | 0 |
About Diele Lôbo
Diele Lôbo is a scholar working on Global and Planetary Change, Nature and Landscape Conservation, Sociology and Political Science, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics and Management of Technology and Innovation, having authored 9 papers that have together received 287 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Plant and animal studies (2 papers), Species Distribution and Climate Change (2 papers), Management and Organizational Studies (2 papers), Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (2 papers), Climate Change Communication and Perception (2 papers), Entrepreneurship Studies and Influences (2 papers), Innovation and Socioeconomic Development (1 paper) and Insect and Arachnid Ecology and Behavior (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Nature and Landscape Conservation (182 citations), Ecological Modeling (42 citations), Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (139 citations), Global and Planetary Change (102 citations) and Forestry (17 citations). Diele Lôbo has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Brazil and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Marcelo Tabarelli, Tarciso C. C. Leão, Felipe P. L. Melo, André Maurício Melo Santos, Inara R. Leal, Lorraine Scotson, Alexandre Ardichvili, Sílvia Pereira de Castro Casa Nova, Ricardo Ribeiro Rodrigues and Sérgius Gandolfi. Their work appears in journals such as Conservation Biology, Ecological Economics, Diversity and Distributions, Biological Conservation and Sustainability.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.