Didier Verloo

34 papers receiving 1.3k citations

Peers

Didier Verloo
Comparison fields: 5 of 130
  • Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology 201
  • Parasitology 231
  • Epidemiology 748
  • Molecular Medicine 86
  • Small Animals 128
Replace Daniel Asrat with:
Daniel Asrat Ethiopia
Gabriel Trueba Ecuador
Fernando Sánchez‐Vizcaíno United Kingdom
Tesfaye Sisay Tessema Ethiopia
Soawapak Hinjoy Thailand
E. Jane Parmley Canada
Benoît Garin France
Lucy Ndip Cameroon
Ana Mateus United Kingdom
Manivanh Vongsouvath Laos
Didier Verloo relative to Daniel Asrat Ethiopia Daniel Asrat's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.8×
Daniel Asrat · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Didier Verloo

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Didier Verloo's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Didier Verloo with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Didier Verloo more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Didier Verloo

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Didier Verloo. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Didier Verloo. The network helps show where Didier Verloo may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Didier Verloo, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Didier Verloo Line = papers co-authored together Didier Verloo links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 35 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2008383
2 200082
3 200181
4 200177
5 200972
6 200164
7
Evaluation of the micro-CATT, CATT/Trypanosoma brucei gambiense, and LATEX/T b gambiense methods for serodiagnosis and surveillance of human African trypanosomiasis in West and Central Africa.
200262
8 200055
9 200746
10 201441
11 201641
12 200341
13 200937
14 200537
15 200935
16 200233
17 200529
18 199928
19 200926
20 199824

About Didier Verloo

Didier Verloo is a scholar working on Epidemiology, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Small Animals, Agronomy and Crop Science and Immunology, having authored 35 papers that have together received 1.4k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Trypanosoma species research and implications (17 papers), Research on Leishmaniasis Studies (11 papers), Animal Disease Management and Epidemiology (5 papers), Vector-Borne Animal Diseases (4 papers), Helminth infection and control (4 papers), Risk Perception and Management (3 papers), T-cell and Retrovirus Studies (2 papers) and Toxin Mechanisms and Immunotoxins (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology (201 citations), Parasitology (231 citations), Epidemiology (748 citations), Molecular Medicine (86 citations) and Small Animals (128 citations). Didier Verloo has collaborated with scholars based in Belgium, Italy and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Philippe Büscher, E. Magnus, Herman Goossens, Matus Ferech, N. van de Sande-Bruinsma, J. Monen, Edine Tiemersma, Hajo Grundmann, Bruno Goddeeris and Filip Claes. Their work appears in journals such as Veterinary Parasitology, Preventive Veterinary Medicine, Acta Tropica, EFSA Journal and Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact