Diane Phillips

21 papers receiving 264 citations

Peers

Diane Phillips
Comparison fields: 5 of 76
  • Research and Theory 6
  • Language and Linguistics 50
  • Human Factors and Ergonomics 8
  • Literature and Literary Theory 34
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 33
Replace Caroline Torres with:
Caroline Torres United States
Mary Motz Canada
Mary Chabeli South Africa
Eva Liang United States
Deborah Busch United States
Dan Rothstein United States
Jesper von Seelen Denmark
Pedro Moruno Miralles Spain
Fatemeh Vizeshfar Iran
Leen Aper Belgium
Diane Phillips relative to Caroline Torres United States Caroline Torres's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×7.1×
Caroline Torres · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Diane Phillips

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Diane Phillips's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Diane Phillips with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Diane Phillips more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Diane Phillips

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Diane Phillips. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Diane Phillips. The network helps show where Diane Phillips may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Diane Phillips, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Diane Phillips Line = papers co-authored together Diane Phillips links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 23 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1
Teaching practice handbook
198377
2 201448
3 200734
4 200227
5 201217
6 201915
7 201214
8
Projects with Young Learners
200012
9 201510
10 200710
11 20068
12 20187
13 20086
14 20175
15 19955
16 20135
17 20074
18 20084
19 20134
20
Investigating the feasibility and reliability of a task trainer incorporating haptics and virtual reality (VR) to enhance midwifery student learning.
20161

About Diane Phillips

Diane Phillips is a scholar working on Education, Epidemiology, Human Factors and Ergonomics, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health and Surgery, having authored 23 papers that have together received 314 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Adult and Continuing Education Topics (4 papers), Reflective Practices in Education (4 papers), Innovative Education and Learning Practices (3 papers), Higher Education Learning Practices (2 papers), Prenatal Substance Exposure Effects (2 papers), Breastfeeding Practices and Influences (2 papers), Art Therapy and Mental Health (2 papers) and Simulation-Based Education in Healthcare (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Research and Theory (6 citations), Language and Linguistics (50 citations), Human Factors and Ergonomics (8 citations), Literature and Literary Theory (34 citations) and Developmental and Educational Psychology (33 citations). Diane Phillips has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United States and China. Frequent co-authors include Steve Walters, Barbara Hayes, Maxine Duke, Alison M. Hutchinson, Karissa D. Horton, Robert J. Bensley, Kara M. Bensley, Helen Forbes, Kristina Thomas and Helen Cox. Their work appears in journals such as Women and Birth, Collegian Journal of the Royal College of Nursing Australia, Journal of Human Lactation, Transplantation and Journal of Nutrition Education and Behavior.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact