Diane Cooper

94 papers receiving 2.3k citations

Peers

Diane Cooper
Comparison fields: 5 of 134
  • Infectious Diseases 909
  • General Health Professions 784
  • Reproductive Medicine 180
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology 113
  • Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health 277
Replace Jane Harries with:
Jane Harries South Africa
Mags Beksinska South Africa
Rebecca French United Kingdom
Clare Tanton United Kingdom
Malcolm Potts United States
Casey E. Copen United States
Alexandra M. Minnis United States
Rachel Snow United States
Daniel Grace Canada
Vera Paiva Brazil
Diane Cooper relative to Jane Harries South Africa Jane Harries's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.0×
Jane Harries · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Diane Cooper

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Diane Cooper's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Diane Cooper with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Diane Cooper more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Diane Cooper

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Diane Cooper. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Diane Cooper. The network helps show where Diane Cooper may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Diane Cooper, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Diane Cooper Line = papers co-authored together Diane Cooper links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 99 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2007284
2 2009189
3 2006106
4 201491
5 200887
6 200487
7 201178
8 201476
9 200768
10 201667
11 200067
12 200850
13 200847
14 200745
15 200642
16 201337
17 201536
18
Safer conception interventions for HIV-affected couples: implications for resource-constrained settings.
201135
19 200635
20 200334

About Diane Cooper

Diane Cooper is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Infectious Diseases, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health and Epidemiology, having authored 99 papers that have together received 2.4k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Adolescent Sexual and Reproductive Health (33 papers), HIV/AIDS Research and Interventions (29 papers), Reproductive Health and Contraception (10 papers), Global Maternal and Child Health (8 papers), HIV/AIDS Impact and Responses (6 papers), Cervical Cancer and HPV Research (5 papers), Reproductive Health and Technologies (5 papers) and LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Infectious Diseases (909 citations), General Health Professions (784 citations), Reproductive Medicine (180 citations), Obstetrics and Gynecology (113 citations) and Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health (277 citations). Diane Cooper has collaborated with scholars based in South Africa, United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Jane Harries, Landon Myer, Phyllis Orner, Jennifer Moodley, Hillary Bracken, Virginia Zweigenthal, Margaret Hoffman, Linda‐Gail Bekker, Lynn Rosenberg and Joanne E. Mantell. Their work appears in journals such as BMC Public Health, Reproductive Health Matters, AIDS Care, AIDS and Behavior and Social Science & Medicine.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact