Diana Stuart

74 papers receiving 1.6k citations

Peers

Diana Stuart
Comparison fields: 5 of 130
  • General Agricultural and Biological Sciences 402
  • Global and Planetary Change 358
  • Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law 185
  • Soil Science 136
  • Geography, Planning and Development 72
Replace Sarah P. Church with:
Sarah P. Church United States
Ajay S. Singh United States
Julie Urquhart United Kingdom
Corinne Valdivia United States
Gérald Schwarz Germany
John McDonagh Ireland
Romy Greiner Australia
Christopher Short United Kingdom
Calum Brown United Kingdom
Stefan Mann Switzerland
Diana Stuart relative to Sarah P. Church United States Sarah P. Church's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.8×
Sarah P. Church · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Diana Stuart

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Diana Stuart's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Diana Stuart with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Diana Stuart more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Diana Stuart

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Diana Stuart. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Diana Stuart. The network helps show where Diana Stuart may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Diana Stuart, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Diana Stuart Line = papers co-authored together Diana Stuart links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 77 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2013196
2 201278
3 201276
4 201470
5 200867
6 200855
7 201752
8 201951
9 201247
10 201947
11 201741
12 201741
13 200840
14 202039
15 201838
16 201136
17 201933
18 201933
19 201532
20 201829

About Diana Stuart

Diana Stuart is a scholar working on Plant Science, Sociology and Political Science, Global and Planetary Change, General Agricultural and Biological Sciences and Economics and Econometrics, having authored 77 papers that have together received 1.7k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Organic Food and Agriculture (21 papers), Climate Change and Geoengineering (11 papers), Agriculture, Land Use, Rural Development (9 papers), Climate Change Communication and Perception (9 papers), Sustainability and Climate Change Governance (8 papers), Global Energy and Sustainability Research (7 papers), Agricultural Innovations and Practices (7 papers) and Climate change impacts on agriculture (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in General Agricultural and Biological Sciences (402 citations), Global and Planetary Change (358 citations), Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law (185 citations), Soil Science (136 citations) and Geography, Planning and Development (72 citations). Diana Stuart has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Canada and South Africa. Frequent co-authors include Ryan Gunderson, Rebecca L. Schewe, Brian Petersen, Matthew Houser, Sean Gillon, Adam Reimer, Sandra T. Marquart‐Pyatt, Michelle R. Worosz, Michael Carolan and Sun‐Jin Yun. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics, Sociologia Ruralis, Agriculture and Human Values, Environmental Sociology and Land Use Policy.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact