Diana Lim

969 citations
31 papers · 428 · h-index 11

Impact in

Papers in

Diana Lim

28 papers receiving 420 citations

Peers

Diana Lim
Comparison fields: 5 of 50
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology 193
  • Reproductive Medicine 191
  • Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 71
  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine 37
  • Oncology 44
Replace Louise De Brot with:
Louise De Brot Brazil
Tomoyuki Ichimura Japan
Ian Harley United Kingdom
Tomoko Hirakawa Japan
Beata Śpiewankiewicz Poland
Takeo Otsuki Japan
Kelly A. Devereaux United States
Manami Imai Japan
Asad Haider United States
Akira Yabuno Japan
Diana Lim relative to Louise De Brot Brazil Louise De Brot's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.4×
Louise De Brot · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Diana Lim

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Diana Lim's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Diana Lim with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Diana Lim more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Diana Lim

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Diana Lim. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Diana Lim. The network helps show where Diana Lim may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Diana Lim, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Diana Lim Line = papers co-authored together Diana Lim links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 31 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201559
2 201752
3 201550
4 201344
5 201338
6 201027
7 201019
8 201218
9 201015
10 201014
11 200613
12 202210
13 20159
14 20129
15 20246
16 20176
17 20196
18 20206
19 20245
20 20154

About Diana Lim

Diana Lim is a scholar working on Reproductive Medicine, Obstetrics and Gynecology, Molecular Biology, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine and Pathology and Forensic Medicine, having authored 31 papers that have together received 428 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Ovarian cancer diagnosis and treatment (11 papers), Endometrial and Cervical Cancer Treatments (7 papers), Uterine Myomas and Treatments (3 papers), Lymphoma Diagnosis and Treatment (3 papers), Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics (2 papers), Circular RNAs in diseases (2 papers), Chromatin Remodeling and Cancer (2 papers) and Gestational Trophoblastic Disease Studies (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Obstetrics and Gynecology (193 citations), Reproductive Medicine (191 citations), Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine (71 citations), Pathology and Forensic Medicine (37 citations) and Oncology (44 citations). Diana Lim has collaborated with scholars based in Singapore, United States and France. Frequent co-authors include Esther Oliva, Robert A. Soslow, Any Cheung, Philip P.C. Ip, Takako Kiyokawa, C. Blake Gilks, Melissa P. Murray, Kay J. Park, Emanuela Veras and Rajmohan Murali. Their work appears in journals such as The American Journal of Surgical Pathology, Clinical Cancer Research, Gynecologic Oncology, Histopathology and Pathology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact