Diana E. Wolf

22 papers receiving 1.4k citations

Peers

Diana E. Wolf
Comparison fields: 5 of 67
  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 556
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation 314
  • Plant Science 779
  • Genetics 508
  • Ecological Modeling 41
Replace Kevin Livingstone with:
Kevin Livingstone United States
Joëlle Ronfort France
Stéphanie Mariette France
Eric J. Baack United States
Guillaume Chomicki United Kingdom
M. Anzidei Italy
J. M. M. Van Damme Netherlands
Philipp M. Schlüter Switzerland
Jin‐Hua Ran China
Timothy P. Holtsford United States
Diana E. Wolf relative to Kevin Livingstone United States Kevin Livingstone's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Kevin Livingstone · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Diana E. Wolf

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Diana E. Wolf's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Diana E. Wolf with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Diana E. Wolf more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Diana E. Wolf

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Diana E. Wolf. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Diana E. Wolf. The network helps show where Diana E. Wolf may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Diana E. Wolf, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Diana E. Wolf Line = papers co-authored together Diana E. Wolf links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 23 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2001449
2 2003227
3 1997135
4 2005126
5 200492
6 200569
7 200368
8 199449
9 200743
10 200939
11 200133
12 201521
13 201020
14 202014
15 199714
16 201214
17 200013
18 201410
19 201110
20 20195

About Diana E. Wolf

Diana E. Wolf is a scholar working on Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Genetics, Molecular Biology, Plant Science and Nature and Landscape Conservation, having authored 23 papers that have together received 1.5k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Plant and animal studies (7 papers), Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (6 papers), Plant Reproductive Biology (5 papers), Chromosomal and Genetic Variations (3 papers), Genetic diversity and population structure (3 papers), Genetically Modified Organisms Research (2 papers), Insect and Arachnid Ecology and Behavior (2 papers) and Rangeland and Wildlife Management (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (556 citations), Nature and Landscape Conservation (314 citations), Plant Science (779 citations), Genetics (508 citations) and Ecological Modeling (41 citations). Diana E. Wolf has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Germany and New Zealand. Frequent co-authors include Loren H. Rieseberg, Naoki Takebayashi, Lynda F. Delph, Allison A. Snow, M. J. Paulsen, Diana Pilson, Sarena M. Selbo, Michael Reagon, Jeannette Whitton and Dulce M. Arias. Their work appears in journals such as Heredity, American Journal of Botany, Perspectives in Plant Ecology Evolution and Systematics, The American Naturalist and Genetics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact