Dian Squire

999 citations
33 papers · 617 · h-index 12

Impact in

Papers in

Dian Squire

28 papers receiving 548 citations

Peers

Dian Squire
Comparison fields: 5 of 68
  • Education 356
  • Gender Studies 79
  • Social Psychology 149
  • Sociology and Political Science 336
  • Research and Theory 4
Replace Frank Hernández with:
Frank Hernández United States
Michelle M. Espino United States
Kathy Bickmore Canada
Frank Tuitt United States
Cristóbal Salinas United States
Jepkorir Rose Chepyator-Thomson United States
Chayla Haynes United States
Elizabeth J. Allan United States
Özlem Sensoy Canada
Linden West United Kingdom
Dian Squire relative to Frank Hernández United States Frank Hernández's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.1×
Frank Hernández · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Dian Squire

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Dian Squire's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Dian Squire with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Dian Squire more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Dian Squire

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Dian Squire. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Dian Squire. The network helps show where Dian Squire may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 15 scholars most cited alongside Dian Squire, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Dian Squire Line = papers co-authored together Dian Squire links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 33 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2015181
2 201368
3 201858
4 201851
5 201935
6 201434
7 201932
8 201923
9 202123
10 201714
11 201913
12 202412
13 201610
14 201410
15 20208
16 20187
17
Engaging Race and Power in Higher Education Organizations Through a Critical Race Institutional Logics Perspective
20156
18 20184
19 20204
20 20234

About Dian Squire

Dian Squire is a scholar working on Education, Sociology and Political Science, Social Psychology, Gender Studies and Communication, having authored 33 papers that have together received 617 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Higher Education Research Studies (16 papers), Critical Race Theory in Education (15 papers), Mentoring and Academic Development (6 papers), International Student and Expatriate Challenges (4 papers), Race, History, and American Society (4 papers), LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy (3 papers), Global Education and Multiculturalism (3 papers) and Higher Education Governance and Development (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Education (356 citations), Gender Studies (79 citations), Social Psychology (149 citations), Sociology and Political Science (336 citations) and Research and Theory (4 citations). Dian Squire has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include OiYan Poon, Frank Tuitt, B. Williams, Z Nicolazzo, Jason C. K. Chan, Corinne Maekawa Kodama, Steve D. Mobley, Jason C. Garvey, Susan Rankin and Rosemary J. Perez. Their work appears in journals such as The Urban Review, Journal of Diversity in Higher Education, International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, Teachers College Record The Voice of Scholarship in Education and Journal of college student development.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact