D.G. MacGregor

17 papers receiving 461 citations

Peers

D.G. MacGregor
Comparison fields: 5 of 67
  • Physiology 112
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 236
  • Neurology 77
  • Biological Psychiatry 18
  • Developmental Neuroscience 29
Replace Michela Giustizieri with:
Michela Giustizieri Italy
A Forlani Italy
Carlos R. Lazo United States
Toshimasa Sakamoto United States
N.A. Solovyova United Kingdom
Katja Hoehn Canada
E. Milusheva Bulgaria
Damien Toulorge France
Wagner C. Martins Brazil
Alexandre dos Santos‐Rodrigues Brazil
D.G. MacGregor relative to Michela Giustizieri Italy Michela Giustizieri's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.7×
Michela Giustizieri · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by D.G. MacGregor

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of D.G. MacGregor's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by D.G. MacGregor with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites D.G. MacGregor more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by D.G. MacGregor

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by D.G. MacGregor. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by D.G. MacGregor. The network helps show where D.G. MacGregor may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 20 scholars most cited alongside D.G. MacGregor, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with D.G. MacGregor Line = papers co-authored together D.G. MacGregor links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

17 of 17 papers shown
#Work
1 1996105
2 200395
3 199343
4 200137
5 199330
6 200026
7 199426
8 199723
9 200421
10 199615
11 199810
12 20078
13 19948
14 19927
15 19966
16 19944
17 19944

About D.G. MacGregor

D.G. MacGregor is a scholar working on Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Physiology, Molecular Biology, Neurology and Neurology, having authored 17 papers that have together received 468 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (12 papers), Adenosine and Purinergic Signaling (8 papers), Ion channel regulation and function (4 papers), Traumatic Brain Injury and Neurovascular Disturbances (3 papers), Neuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms (3 papers), Vitamin C and Antioxidants Research (2 papers), Neurological Disorders and Treatments (1 paper) and Neurological Complications and Syndromes (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Physiology (112 citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (236 citations), Neurology (77 citations), Biological Psychiatry (18 citations) and Developmental Neuroscience (29 citations). D.G. MacGregor has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom and United States. Frequent co-authors include Trevor W. Stone, Margaret E. Rice, Marat V. Avshalumov, David I. Graham, Paul A. Jones, Michael J. Higgins, William Maxwell, William J. Miller, Mitchell Chesler and H Carswell. Their work appears in journals such as Brain Research, European Journal of Neuroscience, British Journal of Pharmacology, Experimental Neurology and Advances in experimental medicine and biology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact