Devon Radford
Impact in
- Ecology top 5%
- Bacteriophages and microbial interactions
- Endocrinology top 10%
Papers in
- Ecology 9
- Bacteriophages and microbial interactions 6
-
- Salmonella and Campylobacter epidemiology 5
- Probiotics and Fermented Foods 5
- Co-authors
- S. Balamurugan (7 shared papers)Karen L. Maxwell (3 shared papers)Alan R. Davidson (2 shared papers)Lia Cardarelli (2 shared papers)Lisa G. Pell (1 shared paper)Rachel Shannon (1 shared paper)Philip G. Strange (3 shared papers)Hanie Ahmadi (2 shared papers)
- Journals
- Journal of Animal Science (3 papers)Journal of Food Protection (2 papers)Frontiers in Microbiology (2 papers)Advances in experimental medicine and biology (1 paper)Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- CanadaUnited StatesUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Devon Radford
21 papers receiving 561 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 66
- Ecology 328
- Endocrinology 51
- Microbiology 47
- Biotechnology 63
- Food Science 106
Countries citing papers authored by Devon Radford
This map shows the geographic impact of Devon Radford's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Devon Radford with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Devon Radford more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Devon Radford
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Devon Radford. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Devon Radford. The network helps show where Devon Radford may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Devon Radford, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 21 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2011 | 121 | |
| 2 | 2009 | 64 | |
| 3 | 2021 | 60 | |
| 4 | 2010 | 55 | |
| 5 | 2017 | 52 | |
| 6 | 2019 | 49 | |
| 7 | 2017 | 39 | |
| 8 | 2011 | 30 | |
| 9 | 1981 | 18 | |
| 10 | 1981 | 17 | |
| 11 | 2021 | 15 | |
| 12 | 2018 | 11 | |
| 13 | 2023 | 9 | |
| 14 | 2023 | 9 | |
| 15 | 2008 | 8 | |
| 16 | 2016 | 8 | |
| 17 | 2003 | 6 | |
| 18 | 2021 | 3 | |
| 19 | 2018 | 3 | |
| 20 | 2023 | 2 |
About Devon Radford
Devon Radford is a scholar working on Ecology, Food Science, Molecular Biology, Biotechnology and Plant Science, having authored 21 papers that have together received 580 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Bacteriophages and microbial interactions (6 papers), Salmonella and Campylobacter epidemiology (5 papers), Probiotics and Fermented Foods (5 papers), Plant Pathogens and Resistance (3 papers), Listeria monocytogenes in Food Safety (3 papers), Bacterial Genetics and Biotechnology (3 papers), Microbial Inactivation Methods (2 papers) and RNA and protein synthesis mechanisms (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Ecology (328 citations), Endocrinology (51 citations), Microbiology (47 citations), Biotechnology (63 citations) and Food Science (106 citations). Devon Radford has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include S. Balamurugan, Karen L. Maxwell, Alan R. Davidson, Lia Cardarelli, Lisa G. Pell, Rachel Shannon, Philip G. Strange, Hanie Ahmadi, G.F. Ibrahim and Loong‐Tak Lim. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Animal Science, Journal of Food Protection, Frontiers in Microbiology, Advances in experimental medicine and biology and Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.