Peter William Schofield

4.6k citations
101 papers · 3.7k · h-index 33

Impact in

Papers in

Peter William Schofield

96 papers receiving 3.5k citations

Peers

Peter William Schofield
Comparison fields: 5 of 142
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 779
  • Sensory Systems 188
  • Neurology 384
  • Epidemiology 655
  • Emergency Medicine 169
Replace Sarah Jane Banks with:
Sarah Jane Banks United States
Allen E. Thornton Canada
Ville Artto Finland
Christopher Sivert Nielsen Norway
Markus Schürks United States
Sámuel Komoly Hungary
Richard C. Rogers United States
Dorit Carmelli United States
Ming Xin Tang United States
Michael J. Esser Canada
Peter William Schofield relative to Sarah Jane Banks United States Sarah Jane Banks's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3.0×
Sarah Jane Banks · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Peter William Schofield

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Peter William Schofield's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peter William Schofield with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peter William Schofield more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Peter William Schofield

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peter William Schofield. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peter William Schofield. The network helps show where Peter William Schofield may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Peter William Schofield, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Peter William Schofield Line = papers co-authored together Peter William Schofield links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 101 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1998288
2 1997227
3 1997213
4 1997172
5 2013161
6 2012131
7 2012122
8 2015119
9 2010110
10 199793
11 199692
12 199591
13 201489
14 199689
15 201585
16 201485
17 200683
18 199778
19 201077
20 200477

About Peter William Schofield

Peter William Schofield is a scholar working on Psychiatry and Mental health, Sensory Systems, Clinical Psychology, Physiology and Epidemiology, having authored 101 papers that have together received 3.7k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research (16 papers), Olfactory and Sensory Function Studies (11 papers), Traumatic Brain Injury Research (10 papers), Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending (9 papers), Alzheimer's disease research and treatments (6 papers), Advanced Chemical Sensor Technologies (4 papers), Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis (4 papers) and Genetic Associations and Epidemiology (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Psychiatry and Mental health (779 citations), Sensory Systems (188 citations), Neurology (384 citations), Epidemiology (655 citations) and Emergency Medicine (169 citations). Peter William Schofield has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Yaakov Stern, Karen S. Marder, G. Dooneief, Mary C. Sano, Diane M. Jacobs, Tony Gerard Butler, Richard P Mayeux, Andrew John Gardner, Karen L. Bell and Mark McEvoy. Their work appears in journals such as Neurology, Alzheimer s & Dementia, Journal of Alzheimer s Disease, BMJ Open and Frontiers in Psychology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact