Detlef Böcking
Impact in
-
- Neurobiology and Insect Physiology Research
- Aquatic Science top 5%
- Aquaculture Nutrition and Growth
Papers in
-
- Neurobiology and Insect Physiology Research 11
- Ecology 8
- Crustacean biology and ecology 6
- Physiological and biochemical adaptations 3
- Co-authors
- Rainer Keller (3 shared papers)Heinrich Dircksen (3 shared papers)René Lafont (5 shared papers)Chantal Dauphin‐Villemant (7 shared papers)Dietrich Sedlmeier (4 shared papers)Lynn M. Riddiford (1 shared paper)Kiyoshi Hiruma (1 shared paper)Sabine Daufeldt (2 shared papers)
In The Last Decade
Detlef Böcking
12 papers receiving 516 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 46
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 463
- Aquatic Science 113
- Ecology 241
- Insect Science 103
- Immunology 144
Countries citing papers authored by Detlef Böcking
This map shows the geographic impact of Detlef Böcking's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Detlef Böcking with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Detlef Böcking more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Detlef Böcking
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Detlef Böcking. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Detlef Böcking. The network helps show where Detlef Böcking may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 19 scholars most cited alongside Detlef Böcking, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2002 | 126 | |
| 2 | 2001 | 124 | |
| 3 | 2001 | 81 | |
| 4 | 1997 | 70 | |
| 5 | 1993 | 37 | |
| 6 | 1999 | 31 | |
| 7 | 1997 | 27 | |
| 8 | 1995 | 21 | |
| 9 | 1994 | 9 | |
| 10 | 1999 | 6 | |
| 11 | Metabolism of 3-dehydroecdysone in the crayfish Orconectes limosus (Crustacea: Decapoda) | 2013 | 4 |
| 12 | 1999 | 4 |
About Detlef Böcking
Detlef Böcking is a scholar working on Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Ecology, Insect Science, Genetics and Immunology, having authored 12 papers that have together received 540 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Neurobiology and Insect Physiology Research (11 papers), Crustacean biology and ecology (6 papers), Insect Utilization and Effects (4 papers), Invertebrate Immune Response Mechanisms (3 papers), Insect and Arachnid Ecology and Behavior (3 papers), Physiological and biochemical adaptations (3 papers), RNA and protein synthesis mechanisms (1 paper) and Mosquito-borne diseases and control (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (463 citations), Aquatic Science (113 citations), Ecology (241 citations), Insect Science (103 citations) and Immunology (144 citations). Detlef Böcking has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, France and Israel. Frequent co-authors include Rainer Keller, Heinrich Dircksen, René Lafont, Chantal Dauphin‐Villemant, Dietrich Sedlmeier, Lynn M. Riddiford, Kiyoshi Hiruma, Sabine Daufeldt, Geert Baggerman and Peter P. Jaros. Their work appears in journals such as Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications, Molecular and Cellular Endocrinology, Biochemical Journal, Archives of Insect Biochemistry and Physiology and Insect Biochemistry and Molecular Biology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.