Derek Denney
Impact in
- Ecological Modeling top 10%
- Species Distribution and Climate Change
-
- Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies
Papers in
-
- Species Distribution and Climate Change 4
-
- Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies 3
- Co-authors
- Jill T. Anderson (5 shared papers)M. Inam Jameel (2 shared papers)Elena Hamann (1 shared paper)Samantha Day (1 shared paper)Jordan B. Bemmels (1 shared paper)Susana M. Wadgymar (1 shared paper)Megan L. DeMarche (1 shared paper)James S. Santangelo (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- New Phytologist (1 paper)Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science (1 paper)Integrative and Comparative Biology (1 paper)Science (1 paper)AoB Plants (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United StatesItalyCanada
In The Last Decade
Derek Denney
6 papers receiving 117 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 39
- Ecological Modeling 35
- Nature and Landscape Conservation 41
- Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 31
- Plant Science 39
- Ecology 23
Countries citing papers authored by Derek Denney
This map shows the geographic impact of Derek Denney's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Derek Denney with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Derek Denney more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Derek Denney
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Derek Denney. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Derek Denney. The network helps show where Derek Denney may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 22 scholars most cited alongside Derek Denney, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2020 | 54 | |
| 2 | 2020 | 39 | |
| 3 | 2020 | 10 | |
| 4 | 2025 | 9 | |
| 5 | 2024 | 5 | |
| 6 | High-resolution Imaging of Retinal Structure in Retinitis Pigmentosa and Usher Syndrome | 2013 | 2 |
| 7 | 2025 | 0 |
About Derek Denney
Derek Denney is a scholar working on Ecological Modeling, Nature and Landscape Conservation, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Plant Science and Molecular Biology, having authored 7 papers that have together received 119 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Species Distribution and Climate Change (4 papers), Plant and animal studies (3 papers), Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (3 papers), Plant responses to elevated CO2 (2 papers), Cancer Immunotherapy and Biomarkers (1 paper), Glaucoma and retinal disorders (1 paper), Retinal and Optic Conditions (1 paper) and Melanoma and MAPK Pathways (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Ecological Modeling (35 citations), Nature and Landscape Conservation (41 citations), Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (31 citations), Plant Science (39 citations) and Ecology (23 citations). Derek Denney has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Italy and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Jill T. Anderson, M. Inam Jameel, Elena Hamann, Samantha Day, Jordan B. Bemmels, Susana M. Wadgymar, Megan L. DeMarche, James S. Santangelo, Ian Breckheimer and Brent Siesky. Their work appears in journals such as New Phytologist, Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science, Integrative and Comparative Biology, Science and AoB Plants.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.