De-Ping Wei
Impact in
- Cell Biology top 1%
- Plant Pathogens and Fungal Diseases
- Pharmacology top 2%
- Fungal Biology and Applications
- Microbial Natural Products and Biosynthesis
Papers in
- Cell Biology 21
- Plant Pathogens and Fungal Diseases 21
-
- Mycorrhizal Fungi and Plant Interactions 20
- Co-authors
- Kevin D. Hyde (9 shared papers)Peter E. Mortimer (5 shared papers)Dhanushka N. Wanasinghe (7 shared papers)Jianchu Xu (4 shared papers)Chitrabhanu Sharma Bhunjun (4 shared papers)Chaiwat To-anun (4 shared papers)Jutamart Monkai (3 shared papers)Yuan-Pin Xiao (2 shared papers)
In The Last Decade
De-Ping Wei
27 papers receiving 1.8k citations
De-Ping Wei's Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 84
- Cell Biology 1.2k
- Pharmacology 602
- Plant Science 1.3k
- Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 340
- Insect Science 121
Countries citing papers authored by De-Ping Wei
This map shows the geographic impact of De-Ping Wei's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by De-Ping Wei with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites De-Ping Wei more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by De-Ping Wei
This network shows the impact of papers produced by De-Ping Wei. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by De-Ping Wei. The network helps show where De-Ping Wei may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside De-Ping Wei, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 27 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | The amazing potential of fungi: 50 ways we can exploit fungi industrially Hit paper breakdown → | 2019 | 612 |
| 2 | Fungal diversity notes 929–1035: taxonomic and phylogenetic contributions on genera and species of fungi Hit paper breakdown → | 2019 | 305 |
| 3 | 2020 | 241 | |
| 4 | 2019 | 237 | |
| 5 | 2020 | 121 | |
| 6 | 2019 | 99 | |
| 7 | 2019 | 46 | |
| 8 | 2020 | 24 | |
| 9 | 2019 | 19 | |
| 10 | 2024 | 17 | |
| 11 | 2021 | 16 | |
| 12 | 2021 | 14 | |
| 13 | 2024 | 11 | |
| 14 | 2020 | 9 | |
| 15 | 2021 | 9 | |
| 16 | 2022 | 8 | |
| 17 | 2020 | 7 | |
| 18 | 2022 | 6 | |
| 19 | 2022 | 5 | |
| 20 | 2024 | 4 |
About De-Ping Wei
De-Ping Wei is a scholar working on Cell Biology, Plant Science, Pharmacology, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics and Insect Science, having authored 27 papers that have together received 1.8k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Plant Pathogens and Fungal Diseases (21 papers), Mycorrhizal Fungi and Plant Interactions (20 papers), Fungal Biology and Applications (11 papers), Yeasts and Rust Fungi Studies (6 papers), Lichen and fungal ecology (5 papers), Entomopathogenic Microorganisms in Pest Control (5 papers), Plant Diversity and Evolution (3 papers) and Insect and Arachnid Ecology and Behavior (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cell Biology (1.2k citations), Pharmacology (602 citations), Plant Science (1.3k citations), Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (340 citations) and Insect Science (121 citations). De-Ping Wei has collaborated with scholars based in China, Thailand and Brazil. Frequent co-authors include Kevin D. Hyde, Peter E. Mortimer, Dhanushka N. Wanasinghe, Jianchu Xu, Chitrabhanu Sharma Bhunjun, Chaiwat To-anun, Jutamart Monkai, Yuan-Pin Xiao, Saranyaphat Boonmee and Qi Zhao. Their work appears in journals such as Phytotaxa, Fungal Diversity, MycoKeys, ZooKeys and Frontiers in Microbiology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.