Dennis Cooley

509 citations
48 papers · 301 · h-index 10

Impact in

Papers in

Dennis Cooley

39 papers receiving 278 citations

Peers

Dennis Cooley
Comparison fields: 5 of 78
  • Sociology and Political Science 147
  • Clinical Psychology 51
  • General Health Professions 58
  • Global and Planetary Change 55
  • Health 18
Replace Margaret Crowley with:
Margaret Crowley United States
Christopher Lamb Canada
Nathan H. Perkins United States
Christopher D. O’Connor Canada
Shiloh Krupar United States
Cathrine Degnen United Kingdom
Simone Bignall Australia
Anna Grear United Kingdom
Beatriz Cardona Australia
Arne Johan Vetlesen Norway
Dennis Cooley relative to Margaret Crowley United States Margaret Crowley's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.1×
Margaret Crowley · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Dennis Cooley

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Dennis Cooley's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Dennis Cooley with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Dennis Cooley more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Dennis Cooley

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Dennis Cooley. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Dennis Cooley. The network helps show where Dennis Cooley may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 2 scholars most cited alongside Dennis Cooley, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Dennis Cooley Line = papers co-authored together Dennis Cooley links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 48 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 199351
2 200727
3 201527
4 201626
5 201623
6 200521
7 200714
8 200113
9 200412
10 200310
11 20098
12 20156
13 20134
14 20064
15 20084
16 20064
17 20023
18 20203
19 20083
20 20153

About Dennis Cooley

Dennis Cooley is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Sociology and Political Science, General Health Professions, Philosophy and Clinical Psychology, having authored 48 papers that have together received 301 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Ethics in medical practice (9 papers), Neuroethics, Human Enhancement, Biomedical Innovations (6 papers), Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment (5 papers), Ethics in Clinical Research (4 papers), Free Will and Agency (3 papers), Biomedical Ethics and Regulation (3 papers), Homicide, Infanticide, and Child Abuse (3 papers) and Ethics and Legal Issues in Pediatric Healthcare (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Sociology and Political Science (147 citations), Clinical Psychology (51 citations), General Health Professions (58 citations), Global and Planetary Change (55 citations) and Health (18 citations). Dennis Cooley has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Canada and Kazakhstan. Frequent co-authors include Ann Burnett and George A. Youngs. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Business Ethics, Agricultural History, Metamedicine, The American Journal of Bioethics and Ethical Theory and Moral Practice.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact